Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2025
Same author

New models of care needed to address Canada's shortage of medical specialists.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2025
Same author

Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: An Observational Cohort Study.

JCO precision oncology·2024
Same author

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2024
Same author

Homelessness is a health crisis: why hospitals are resorting to building housing.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2024
Same author

"Social admissions" to hospital are not personal failures but policy ones.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

How to use an article about quality improvement.

Eddy Fan1, Andreas Laupacis, Peter J Pronovost

  • 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1830 E Monument St, Fifth Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. eddy.fan@jhmi.edu

JAMA
|November 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quality improvement (QI) research often has low methodological quality. Evaluating QI interventions requires careful consideration of bias, outcomes, replication, and implementation factors for reliable patient care improvements.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality
  • Clinical Practice Improvement
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Quality improvement (QI) initiatives aim to enhance clinician behavior for better patient outcomes.
  • The methodological rigor of studies assessing QI intervention effectiveness is frequently suboptimal.
  • Existing guidance for evaluating intervention studies needs enhancement for QI-specific challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight critical appraisal issues in quality improvement research.
  • To provide guidance for clinicians evaluating QI studies.
  • To emphasize the need for robust methodologies in QI research.

Main Methods:

  • This article synthesizes existing Users' Guides on intervention effects (Therapy, Harm, Clinical Decision Support Systems, Evidence Summarization).
  • It focuses on issues pertinent to the evaluation of quality improvement interventions.
  • It addresses the practical considerations for implementing QI interventions.

Main Results:

  • Studies evaluating QI interventions often suffer from low methodological quality.
  • Key evaluation concerns include risk of bias, appropriate outcome measurement, and result replication.
  • Successful implementation depends on practice setting suitability, costs, and potential unintended effects.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians and researchers must critically appraise QI studies due to methodological limitations.
  • Robust study designs are essential for reliable QI research, given its potential for widespread adoption.
  • Addressing specific QI evaluation challenges is crucial for advancing patient care through quality improvement.