Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practice guidelines and standards: an overview.

L L Leape1

  • 1Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

QRB. Quality Review Bulletin
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wilm's Tumor: An Update.

Cancer·2018
Same author

Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives.

Quality & safety in health care·2006
Same author

Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

Quality & safety in health care·2004
Same author

Comparison of use of medications after acute myocardial infarction in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare.

Circulation·2001
Same author

Sensitivity and specificity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to identify the overuse and underuse of coronary revascularization and hysterectomy.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2001
Same author

Racial differences in cardiac revascularization rates: does "overuse" explain higher rates among white patients?

Annals of internal medicine·2001
Same journal

Screening and managing abdominal aortic aneurysms at the Ochsner Clinic: suggested algorithm and method of derivation. Department of Surgery and Ochsner Clinic Quality Assurance Committee.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

A quality-of-care analysis of cascade iatrogenesis in frail elderly hospital patients.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Cascade or facade: focusing or obfuscating the pathogenesis of iatrogenesis?

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Ensuring excellence: reconceptualizing quality assurance, risk management, and utilization review.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

Health reform principles for quality: recommendations for the congressional debate.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
Same journal

The critical path method alone does nothing to improve performance.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1993
See all related articles

Practice guidelines, developed with scientific evidence, aim to improve healthcare quality and control costs by reducing inappropriate care. Collaboration among stakeholders is crucial for their effective development and implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy and Management
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Practice guidelines are of significant interest to organized medicine, insurance companies, regulators, and peer review organizations.
  • The U.S. Congress has established the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research to oversee guideline development.
  • Existing guidelines, while used by physicians, are evolving towards more comprehensive and evidence-based approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance and potential benefits of well-developed practice guidelines.
  • To emphasize the role of scientific evidence and expert opinion in creating effective guidelines.
  • To outline the responsibilities of various stakeholders in the guideline lifecycle.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The abstract discusses the conceptual framework and intended application of practice guidelines.
  • It emphasizes the integration of scientific evidence and expert consensus in guideline creation.
  • The text implies a review of the current landscape and future direction of practice guideline development.

    • Main Results:

    • Properly developed and implemented practice guidelines can reduce inappropriate care and control healthcare costs.
    • Newer guidelines are expected to be more comprehensive, specific, and better at distinguishing useful from useless care.
    • Guidelines can enhance care quality when voluntarily adopted, used in quality assurance, and linked to reimbursement.

    Conclusions:

    • Practice guidelines are essential tools for improving healthcare quality and efficiency.
    • Shared responsibility among all stakeholders is vital for the successful research, development, dissemination, and maintenance of guidelines.
    • Continuous evaluation and updating are necessary to ensure guidelines remain relevant and effective.