Related Experiment Videos
Criteria to define response to therapy in paediatric rheumatic diseases
Nicolino Ruperto1, Angela Pistorio, Angelo Ravelli
1IRCCS G. Gaslini, Pediatria II, Reumatologia, Pædiatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), Genoa, Italy. nicolaruperto@ospedale-gaslini.ge.it
Insights
New criteria help evaluate treatment response in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE). These validated measures aid clinical trials and practice for paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD).
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Rheumatology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Outcome Measurement
Background:
- Paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD) encompass juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE).
- Standardized criteria for evaluating treatment response in PRD are crucial for clinical trials and daily practice.
- International collaboration is key to developing robust and validated outcome measures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and validate criteria for assessing treatment response in JIA, JDM, and JSLE.
- To establish core sets of outcome measures for major paediatric rheumatic diseases.
- To provide definitions of improvement for use in clinical trials and practice.
Main Methods:
- A three-phase methodological approach was employed.
- Phase 1 involved literature review and consensus techniques to develop preliminary core sets.
- Phase 2 included large-scale data collection for validation, followed by the final development of validated criteria.
Main Results:
- Core sets include common domains (physician/parent global assessment, disability, quality of life) and disease-specific measures.
- Responder definitions require a minimum improvement (≥30% JIA, ≥20% JDM, ≥50% JSLE) with limited worsening in other variables.
- Validated criteria provide a composite endpoint for evaluating global treatment response.
Conclusions:
- The proposed core sets and improvement definitions offer clinically meaningful composite endpoints for PRD.
- These validated criteria are suitable for use in PRD clinical trials.
- The definitions aim to assist physicians in determining adequate patient response to therapy.
Purpose:
In this review we describe the general methodology and the results of the international projects, conducted by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), in collaboration with the Paediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG). The aim of these projects were to identify and validate criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice in patients with the three major paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD): juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE).
Methods:
The methodological approach to identify and validate outcome measures can be divided into three main phases: (1) the development of a preliminary core set of measures to evaluate the outcome (e.g. response to therapy, remission criteria, disease activity or damage etc.) through literature review and consensus techniques; (2) a large-scale data collection for a prospectively evidence-based validation of the preliminary findings; (3) the final development of a validated criteria for the evaluation of the outcome.
Results:
The core sets for three diseases included domains that are common to all diseases (physician's global assessment of disease activity; parent's global assessment of the overall patient's well-being; disability and/or health-related quality of life) plus additional domains that are specific for each disease. In order to be classified as a responder to a given treatment, a patient should demonstrate a different minimum level of improvement (≥30% in JIA, ≥20% in JDM, and ≥50% in JSLE) with no more than one of the remaining variables worsening by more than 30%.
Conclusions:
The proposed core sets and definitions of improvement incorporate clinically meaningful change in a composite endpoint for the evaluation of global response to therapy in the major PRD. The definitions are proposed for use in PRD clinical trials and may help physicians to decide if a child has responded adequately to therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...