[The new materials in prolapse surgery and incontinence]

In line with the results of general surgeons, who revolutionised the surgical approach and the success rate of ventral hernia repair using synthetic mesh, urologists and gynaecologists recently moved towards the use of prosthesis to augment the native tissues. The rationale was based on the relatively high failure rates of the traditional anterior vaginal compartment repair and the recognition that the native tissue may no longer assume the position, strength or functionality by simple re-approximation. Actually the plethora of mesh or graft material, ranging from absorbable (synthetic and biological) to non-absorbable materials, indicates how uncertain we are about the best management. The surgical results are variable on the basis of 1) the material used (synthetic or biological, absorbable or not absorbable); 2) the position of the mesh (incorporated in the suture, overlay the suture, below or under the fascia); 3) the tension adopted. Major problems concern the complications related to the use of the meshes in urogynaecological surgery and the final message is that surgeons may want to consider adopting use of graft techniques to improve surgical results with care given to carefully monitor complications.