Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Danilo Miskovic1, Susannah M Wyles, Melody Ni
1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Annals of Surgery
|November 26, 2010
Summary
Mentored laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) training improves trainee outcomes, reducing conversion rates. Cadaveric simulation offers the best simulated training environment for developing advanced surgical skills.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Education
- Colorectal Surgery
Background:
- Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is complex and often self-taught.
- Inadequate training and fellowship shortages hinder LCS adoption.
- The efficacy of mentored and simulated training in LCS is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of mentoring and simulation on laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) training.
- To identify key components for acquiring advanced technical skills in LCS.
- To analyze factors influencing conversion rates in LCS.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search using Ovid databases.
- Meta-analysis and mixed-effects regression on mentored vs. non-mentored cases.
- Analysis of training case selection, simulation, and assessment methods.
Main Results:
- Mentored cases showed significantly lower conversion rates (13.3% vs. 20.5%).
- No significant differences in conversion, anastomotic leak, or mortality compared to expert surgeons.
- Male sex, prior surgery, high BMI, low ASA, colorectal cancer, and fistula increased conversion risk.
Conclusions:
- Trainees achieve expert-level results in LCS under experienced mentorship.
- Cadaveric models provide superior simulated training value.
- Further research is needed on skills assessment and simulation's educational impact.
