Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Analyzing Beneficial Effects of Nutritional Supplements on Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Functions During Experimental Colitis
Published on: January 5, 2017
A multi-center, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical study on the efficacy of composite sophora
Zhan-qi Tong1, Bo Yang, Bing-yue Chen
1Department of Chinese Medicine, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. tong.zhanqi@163.com
Objective:
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of composite sophora colon-soluble capsule (CSCC) in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) of the damp-heat accumulation syndrome pattern (DHAS) and to prepare a basis for a phase III clinical trial.
Methods:
A multi-center, randomized, single-blind, and positive drug parallel-controlled design was adopted. There were 126 patients of UC-DHAS stratified and assigned equally to three groups. Patients in two CSCC treated groups, Groups T1 and T2, were treated orally with high (six capsules, thrice a day) and low (four capsules, thrice a day) doses CSCC, and patients in the control group were treated orally with Mesalazine Enteric-coated Tablets (four tablets, thrice a day), respectively, all for eight weeks. The clinical efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated through clinical symptom observations and colonoscopic examinations.
Results:
(1) Full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS) analyses showed the comprehensive curative effect in Groups T1, T2, and the control group, obtaining the values of 85.7%, 92.9%, and 71.4% (P=0.330), and 89.5%, 92.7%, and 73.2% (P=0.552), respectively, demonstrating no statistical significance among the three groups. (2) FAS and PPS analysis showed the efficacy on membranous lesions in Groups T1, T2, and the control group, obtaining the values of 83.3%, 92.9%, and 73.8% (P=0.063), and 86.8%, 92.7%, and 75.6% (P=0.070), respectively, showing statistical insignificance among the three groups. (3) FAS analysis showed an efficacy tendency on improving tenesmus (P=0.056). No changes were found in improving the other symptoms, and statistical significance was not shown among the three groups (P>0.05). PPS analysis showed the efficacy on single item symptom in Groups T1, T2, and the control group was not statistically significant among the three groups (P=0.082).
Conclusions:
The comprehensive effect of CSCC in treating UC is basically equivalent to that of Mesalazine enteric-coated tablet; however, the tendency was shown to improve symptoms. Its efficacy could not be raised by increasing the dosage used. Therefore, the recommended dosage of CSCC is four capsules, three times a day.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:21Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
01:24Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are: