A comparison of methods for assessing alpha phase resetting in electrophysiology, with application to intracerebral...

There are two competing views on the mechanisms underlying the generation of visual evoked potentials/fields in EEG/MEG. The classical hypothesis assumes an additive wave on top of background noise. Another hypothesis states that the evoked activity can totally or partially arise from a phase resetting of the ongoing alpha rhythm. There is no consensus however, on the best tools for distinguishing between these two hypotheses. In this study, we have tested different measures on a large series of simulations under a variety of scenarios, involving in particular trial-to-trial variability and different dynamics of ongoing alpha rhythm. No single measure or set of measures was found to be necessary or sufficient for defining phase resetting in the context of our simulations. Still, simulations permitted to define criteria that were the most reliable in practice for distinguishing additive and phase resetting hypotheses. We have then applied these criteria on intracerebral EEG data recordings in the visual areas during a visual discrimination task. We investigated the intracerebral channels that presented both ERP and ongoing alpha oscillations (n=37). Within these channels, a total of 30% fulfilled phase resetting criteria during the generation of the visual evoked potential, based on criteria derived from simulations. Moreover, 19% of the 37 channels presented dependence of the ERP on the level of pre-stimulus alpha. Only 5% of channels fulfilled both the simulation-related criteria and dependence on baseline alpha level. Our simulation study points out to the difficulty of clearly assessing phase resetting based on observed macroscopic electrophysiological signals. Still, some channels presented an indication of phase resetting in the context of our simulations. This needs to be confirmed by further work, in particular at a smaller recording scale.