Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Role of cardiac resynchronization in end-stage heart failure patients requiring inotrope therapy
Sanjoy Bhattacharya1, Kaleab Abebe, Marc Simon
1Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Insights
Heart failure patients needing inotropes before cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have worse survival. Weaning inotropes before CRT may improve outcomes for these advanced heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients on inotropes undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are not well-defined.
- Patients requiring intravenous inotropes at the time of CRT implantation present a specific challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize survival outcomes in HF patients receiving CRT based on their inotrope use.
- To compare outcomes between CRT recipients and a standard defibrillator group.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 759 CRT-defibrillator recipients categorized by inotrope use: never on inotropes (NI), weaned before implant (PI), or on inotropes at implant (II).
- Comparison with a standard defibrillator (SD) group (n=94).
- Propensity score analysis to adjust for baseline differences and comparison of survival endpoints using the Social Security Death Index.
Main Results:
- Inotrope-dependent patients (II) had more comorbidities and significantly shorter survival than inotrope-naïve (NI) patients.
- After propensity score adjustment, overall survival differences persisted, with a significant pairwise difference between NI and II groups at 12 months.
- Patients ever on inotropes (PI, II) and SD patients requiring inotropes had similar survival.
Conclusions:
- Inotrope-dependent HF patients have worse survival despite CRT, partly due to comorbidities.
- CRT may not offer a survival advantage over standard defibrillators for patients previously on inotropes.
- Pre-CRT inotrope weaning and initiation of neurohormonal antagonists are crucial goals for inotrope-dependent HF patients.
Background:
Outcomes among inotrope-treated heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have not been well characterized, particularly in those requiring intravenous inotropes at the time of implant.
Methods:
We analyzed 759 consecutive CRT-defibrillator recipients who were categorized as never on inotropes (NI; n = 585), weaned from inotropes before implant (PI; n = 124), or on inotropes at implant (II; n = 50). Survival free from heart transplant or ventricular assist device and overall survival were compared using the Social Security Death Index. A patient cohort who underwent unsuccessful CRT implantation and received a standard defibrillator (SD; n = 94) comprised a comparison group. Propensity score analysis was used to control for intergroup baseline differences.
Results:
Compared with the other cohorts, II patients had more comorbidities. Both survival endpoints differed significantly (P < .001) among the 4 cohorts; II patients demonstrated shorter survival than NI patients, with the PI and SD groups having intermediate survival. After adjusting for propensity scores, overall differences and patterns in survival endpoints persisted (P < .01), but the only statistically significant pairwise difference was overall survival between the NI and II groups at 12 months (hazard ratio 2.95, 95% confidence interval 1.05-8.35). CRT recipients ever on inotropes (PI and II) and SD patients ever requiring inotropes (n = 17) experienced similar survival endpoints. Among II patients, predictors of hospital discharge free from inotropes after CRT included male gender, older age, and ability to tolerate β-blockade.
Conclusions:
Inotrope-dependent HF patients show significantly worse survival despite CRT than inotrope-naïve patients, in part because of more comorbid conditions at baseline. CRT may not provide a survival advantage over a standard defibrillator among patients who have received inotropes before CRT. Weaning from inotropes and initiating neurohormonal antagonists before CRT should be an important goal among inotrope-dependent HF patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
