Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Conservation Biology?01:57

What is Conservation Biology?

Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less likely to...
Threats to Biodiversity01:50

Threats to Biodiversity

There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Landscape genetics identifies streams and drainage infrastructure as dispersal corridors for an endangered wetland bird.

Ecology and evolution·2018
Same author

Genetic implications of bottleneck effects of differing severities on genetic diversity in naturally recovering populations: An example from Hawaiian coot and Hawaiian gallinule.

Ecology and evolution·2017
Same author

Managing conservation reliant species: Hawai'i's endangered endemic waterbirds.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2009
Same author

Estimating sustainable bycatch rates for California sea lion populations in the Gulf of California.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2008
Same journal

Integrating Community Perception, Climate Vulnerability Index, and Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Approaches for Climate Risk Assessment of the Persepolis World Heritage Site.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

How are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Revolutionizing Forest Operations? A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Opportunities.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Environmental Justice in Urban River Restoration Efforts.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Perceived Effects of Agri-Environmental Management Practices on Public Good Delivery.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Carbon Sequestration Dynamics and Ecosystem Service Valuation in the Borana Rangeland, Southern Ethiopia: Linking Ecology and Carbon Finance.

Environmental management·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Modeling to Inform Environmental Management.

Environmental management·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Combining landscape-level conservation planning and biodiversity offset programs: a case study.

Jared G Underwood1

  • 1County of San Diego, 5201 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123, USA. jared.underwood@sdcounty.ca.gov

Environmental Management
|November 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Combining landscape-level conservation planning with biodiversity offsets significantly boosts rare species protection. This integrated approach, tested in San Diego County, conserves 5-10 times more habitat for threatened species compared to offsets alone.

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
07:10

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques

Published on: February 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
07:10

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques

Published on: February 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Biology
  • Environmental Planning
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Habitat loss is a primary driver of species endangerment globally.
  • Biodiversity offsets are a strategy to mitigate habitat loss but often lack landscape-level integration.
  • The effectiveness of merging offset policies with landscape conservation planning is largely unquantified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively assess the conservation impact of combining landscape-level conservation planning and biodiversity offset programs.
  • To compare the conservation outcomes of a combined approach versus an offset-only approach.
  • To evaluate the benefits for rare and threatened species persistence.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative assessment of conservation impact in San Diego County, USA.
  • Comparison between regions using a combined landscape-conservation-offset approach and regions using only an offset program.
  • Analysis of conserved species' predicted distribution and documented locations.

Main Results:

  • The combined approach increased conservation for many rare species by 5-10 times compared to the offset-only areas.
  • Conservation efforts were concentrated in areas critical for species survival.
  • The enhanced conservation levels reduce uncertainty regarding species persistence.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating landscape-level conservation planning with biodiversity offsets offers substantial benefits for rare and threatened species.
  • This combined strategy effectively enhances biodiversity conservation outcomes.
  • The San Diego County case study provides a model for successful implementation of integrated conservation planning and offsets.