Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Optimized Negative Staining: a High-throughput Protocol for Examining Small and Asymmetric Protein Structure by Electron Microscopy
Published on: August 15, 2014
Molecular basis for the differences in lipid and lipoprotein binding properties of human apolipoproteins E3 and E4
David Nguyen1, Padmaja Dhanasekaran, Margaret Nickel
1Lipid Research Group, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4318, United States.
Abstract:
Human apolipoprotein (apo) E4 binds preferentially to very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), whereas apoE3 binds preferentially to high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), resulting in different plasma cholesterol levels for the two isoforms. To understand the molecular basis for this effect, we engineered the isolated apoE N-terminal domain (residues 1-191) and C-terminal domain (residues 192-299) together with a series of variants containing deletions in the C-terminal domain and assessed their lipid and lipoprotein binding properties. Both isoforms can bind to a phospholipid (PL)-stabilized triolein emulsion, and residues 261-299 are primarily responsible for this activity. ApoE4 exhibits better lipid binding ability than apoE3 as a consequence of a rearrangement involving the segment spanning residues 261-272 in the C-terminal domain. The strong lipid binding ability of apoE4 coupled with the VLDL particle surface being ∼60% PL-covered is the basis for its preference for binding VLDL rather than HDL. ApoE4 binds much more strongly than apoE3 to VLDL but less strongly than apoE3 to HDL(3), consistent with apoE-lipid interactions being relatively unimportant for binding to HDL. The preference of apoE3 for binding to HDL(3) arises because binding is mediated primarily by interaction of the N-terminal helix bundle domain with the resident apolipoproteins that cover ∼80% of the HDL(3) particle surface. Thus, the selectivity in the binding of apoE3 and apoE4 to HDL(3) and VLDL is dependent upon two factors: (1) the stronger lipid binding ability of apoE4 relative to that of apoE3 and (2) the differences in the nature of the surfaces of VLDL and HDL(3) particles, with the former being largely covered with PL and the latter with protein.
Related Concept Videos
Asymmetric Lipid Bilayer
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In contrast,...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be bound by...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Lipid-derived Compounds in the Human Body
Fat-soluble Vitamins
Fat-soluble vitamins, including vitamins A, D, E, and K, are required in minimal quantities, but their deficiencies can lead to severely abnormal physiological conditions. For example, vitamin A deficiency can cause night blindness, dry skin, delayed...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase

