Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
Published on: July 1, 2015
Fidelity in the Field: Developing Infrastructure and Fine-tuning Measurement
1Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
None:
Mazzucchelli and Sanders (2010) provide a thoughtful, detailed, and complex description of how to encourage flexible fidelity to one well-established, evidence-based treatment, the Triple P- Positive Parenting Program. As the authors highlight, many of the "lessons learned" from this wealth of treatment, research, and implementation experience were developed over decades and can be applied to other evidence based treatments. Underlying many of the recommendations provided by Mazzucchelli and Sanders (2010) is a well-refined infrastructure to support implementation and the need to refine the measurement of fidelity in the field. This commentary will discuss each of those topics. It seems that we have many lessons to learn and hurdles to clear in this emerging area of science, which will be hastened by pioneers like Mazzucchelli and Sanders.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Accuracy and Precision
Distance Corrections
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Random and Systematic Errors
