Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasma cell-free DNA methylation-based prognosis in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

NPJ precision oncology·2025
Same author

Does neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinical T1-2 N0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer increase the extent of axillary surgery?

Surgery·2025
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Contemporary Nodal Management and Overall Survival in Older Patients with HR-/HER2+ Breast Cancer.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

Correction: Contemporary Nodal Management and Overall Survival of Older Patients with HR-/HER2+ Breast Cancer.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

Contemporary Nodal Management and Overall Survival of Older Patients with HR-/HER2+ Breast Cancer.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2025
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis.

Pan Du1, Xiao Zhang, Chiang-Ching Huang

  • 1Northwestern University Biomedical Informatics Center (NUBIC), NUCATS, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. dupan@northwestern.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|December 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The M-value statistic is statistically superior for analyzing DNA methylation differences compared to Beta-values, offering better detection rates. Beta-values provide intuitive interpretation but M-values are recommended for differential methylation analysis.

More Related Videos

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation
12:11

Methodology for Accurate Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Methylation

Published on: May 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • DNA methylation profiling of CpG islands is key for understanding gene epigenetic regulation.
  • Illumina's Infinium assay enables low-cost, high-throughput methylation analysis.
  • Beta-values and M-values are common metrics for methylation levels, but their comparative strengths are unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between Beta-value and M-value statistics.
  • To evaluate the performance of Beta-value and M-value methods in identifying differentially methylated CpG sites.
  • To provide guidance on selecting thresholds for methylation difference analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstrated the Logit transformation relationship between Beta-value and M-value.
  • Designed a methylation titration experiment to assess performance.
  • Evaluated metrics including Detection Rate (DR) and True Positive Rate (TPR).

Main Results:

  • Beta-value method exhibits heteroscedasticity for highly methylated/unmethylated CpG sites.
  • M-value method shows significantly better performance (DR, TPR) for differential methylation analysis.
  • Thresholding improves M-value performance but not Beta-value performance.

Conclusions:

  • M-value offers superior statistical validity for differential methylation analysis.
  • Beta-value provides a more intuitive biological interpretation.
  • Recommend using M-values for differential analysis, reporting Beta-values for context.