Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Assessing pain in ventilated newborns and infants: validation of the Hartwig score
Christoph Hünseler1, Verena Merkt, Mandy Gerloff
1Children's Hospital of the University of Cologne, Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, Cologne, Germany. christoph.huenseler@uni-koeln.de
Abstract:
The Hartwig score was designed to assess pain in ventilated newborns and infants. It comprises the acceptance of mechanical ventilation and the reaction to endotracheal suctioning (grimacing, gross motor movements, eye-opening). The aim of this study was to validate the Hartwig score in terms of concurrent validity, internal consistency, inter-rater correlation and to define a cut-off value with respect to the need for analgesic therapy. Fifty-four video recordings of 28 ventilated newborns and infants up to 10 months old during endotracheal suctioning were assessed by two neonatologists and two nurses using the Hartwig score, Comfort scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in respect to pain. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 12.0. Comparison of the Hartwig score with the VAS resp. Comfort scale, as according to Bland-Altman, gave a mean of the differences of 0.77 resp. 0.15. A cut-off value of 12.1 to discriminate pain requiring treatment had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 100%. Cronbach's alpha of item correlation of the total score was 0.872, deleting the weakest item improved internal consistency to 0.895. Inter-rater correlation was found to be 0.934. Conclusion The Hartwig score showed satisfactory agreement with the VAS and good agreement with the Comfort scale. It is a reliable tool for assessing pain in ventilated newborns and infants. The cut-off value was found to be at 13 points.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Palpation
Thoracic Palpation
Thoracic palpation detects tenderness, masses, lesions, respiratory excursions, and vocal fremitus. The nurse assesses...
