Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice
Published on: February 14, 2021
Ambulatory blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients with β-thalassemia minor
Gregory Vyssoulis1, Eva Karpanou, Stella-Maria Kyvelou
1Hypertension Unit, 1st Cardiology Clinic, Athens University, Hippokration, Hospital, Athens, Greece.
β-thalassemia trait (β-TT) is a common genetic disorder in Mediterranean countries, including Greece. Previous studies have shown the protective effect of β-TT against myocardial infarction. However, the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile of such patients has not yet been investigated. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) profile of hypertensives with β-TT, in comparison with all-cause anemic and non-anemic essential hypertensive patients. The study ultimately comprised of 8861 essential hypertensive, nondiabetic patients who were divided into three groups: group I (n=191, with β-TT), group II (n=655, anemic) and group III (n=8015, nonanemic). All patients underwent full clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic evaluations, whereas all were subjected to ABPM. Anemia was defined as Hb <12 g per 100 ml for women and <13 g per 100 ml for men, whereas patients with β-TT were self-referred. The distribution of dipping patterns among the three groups was 61.3 vs. 41.2 vs. 45.8% (P<0.001), whereas for nondippers it was 20.4 vs. 31.5 vs. 27.7% (P<0.001), for extreme-dippers it was 15.7 vs. 15.0 vs. 17.5% (P<0.001) and for reverse dippers it was 2.6 vs. 12.4 vs. 9.0% (P<0.001). Furthermore, mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) among the three groups was 140.13 ± 7.79 vs. 142.02 ± 11.61 vs. 141.99 ± 9.87 mm Hg (P=0.03), and mean nighttime SBP was 125.87 ± 10.4 vs. 131.13 ± 15.7 vs. 129.62 ± 13.31 mm Hg (P<0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjustments for age, body mass index and lipid levels, the differences among daytime and nighttime SBP remained significant at 140.18 ± 9.84 vs. 142.02 ± 9.85 vs. 141.99 ± 9.85 mm Hg (P=0.04) and 125.99 ± 13.07 vs. 131.19 ± 13.08 vs. 129.61 ± 13.07 mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively. Hypertensive patients with β-TT present with a better 24-h BP profile in comparison with anemic and nonanemic hypertensives. Thus, β-TT may function protectively in their total cardiovascular risk profile.
β-thalassemia trait (β-TT) is a common genetic disorder in Mediterranean countries, including Greece. Previous studies have shown the protective effect of β-TT against myocardial infarction. However, the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile of such patients has not yet been investigated. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) profile of hypertensives with β-TT, in comparison with all-cause anemic and non-anemic essential hypertensive patients. The study ultimately comprised of 8861 essential hypertensive, nondiabetic patients who were divided into three groups: group I (n=191, with β-TT), group II (n=655, anemic) and group III (n=8015, nonanemic). All patients underwent full clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic evaluations, whereas all were subjected to ABPM. Anemia was defined as Hb <12 g per 100 ml for women and <13 g per 100 ml for men, whereas patients with β-TT were self-referred. The distribution of dipping patterns among the three groups was 61.3 vs. 41.2 vs. 45.8% (P<0.001), whereas for nondippers it was 20.4 vs. 31.5 vs. 27.7% (P<0.001), for extreme-dippers it was 15.7 vs. 15.0 vs. 17.5% (P<0.001) and for reverse dippers it was 2.6 vs. 12.4 vs. 9.0% (P<0.001). Furthermore, mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) among the three groups was 140.13 ± 7.79 vs. 142.02 ± 11.61 vs. 141.99 ± 9.87 mm Hg (P=0.03), and mean nighttime SBP was 125.87 ± 10.4 vs. 131.13 ± 15.7 vs. 129.62 ± 13.31 mm Hg (P<0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjustments for age, body mass index and lipid levels, the differences among daytime and nighttime SBP remained significant at 140.18 ± 9.84 vs. 142.02 ± 9.85 vs. 141.99 ± 9.85 mm Hg (P=0.04) and 125.99 ± 13.07 vs. 131.19 ± 13.08 vs. 129.61 ± 13.07 mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively. Hypertensive patients with β-TT present with a better 24-h BP profile in comparison with anemic and nonanemic hypertensives. Thus, β-TT may function protectively in their total cardiovascular risk profile.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Alterations in Blood Pressure
Hypertension (High blood pressure)
Hypertension occurs when blood pressure readings consistently exceed the normal range. It is diagnosed when systolic blood pressure (the top number, indicating pressure while the heart beats)...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)