Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Authors' response.

The Indian journal of medical research·2026
Same author

Some newer & simpler biostatistical approaches for more credible clinical research.

The Indian journal of medical research·2025
Same author

Assessing the Adequacy of a Prediction Model.

Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine·2025
Same author

Basic knowledge and understanding of palliative care among nurses working in a group of tertiary care hospitals.

International journal of palliative nursing·2025
Same author

Chance vs Probability in Medical Practice: Bhagavad Gita and Karma.

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India·2025
Same author

Simplified Sample Size Formulas for Detecting a Medically Important Effect.

Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Statistical fallacies in orthopedic research.

Abhaya Indrayan1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi - 110 095, India.

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
|December 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical fallacies in medical research, particularly in orthopedics, stem from misunderstandings of statistical concepts. Awareness of these common errors is key for researchers to ensure credible reporting and avoid misleading conclusions.

Keywords:
Biased sampledifferential definitioninadequate analysismedical significancemisuse of P- valuesmisuse of means

More Related Videos

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
09:01

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach

Published on: January 24, 2018

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
09:01

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach

Published on: January 24, 2018

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Statistical fallacies are prevalent in medical literature, often arising from a lack of statistical understanding.
  • Researchers may not fully grasp the impact of these errors on their study's credibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common statistical fallacies in medical research, with a specific focus on orthopedic studies.
  • To educate researchers on potential pitfalls in statistical analysis and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing medical literature, including orthopedic research.
  • Incorporation of author's three decades of experience in medical research.
  • Educational approach to explaining statistical concepts and fallacies.

Main Results:

  • Common fallacies include inadequate sample size, incomparable groups, misuse of statistics (percentages, means, graphs), incomplete reporting, and oversimplification.
  • Other issues involve ignoring baseline values, misuse of software, P-value misinterpretation, confusing correlation with causation, and conflating statistical with clinical significance.

Conclusions:

  • Increased researcher awareness of potential statistical fallacies is crucial.
  • Understanding these pitfalls can help researchers produce more credible and reliable scientific reports.