Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Effect of bracket bonding on nanomechanical properties of enamel
Masahiro Iijima1, Takeshi Muguruma, William A Brantley
1Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari-Tobetsu, Hokkaido, Japan. iijima@hoku-iryo-u.ac.jp
Introduction:
In this study, we investigated the nanohardness and elastic modulus of enamel after debonding metal brackets.
Methods:
The surfaces of 3 maxillary premolars were subdivided into 3 regions. Two regions were exposed to a conventional etching system (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and a self-etching system (Transbond Plus primer, 3M Unitek); the third region was not etched. Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT composite to the 2 etched regions. After storage for 24 hours in distilled water, the brackets and residual adhesive were removed, and the teeth were sectioned transversely. Seven nanoindentations (2 mN load) were placed 1 to 25 μm from the surface in each region. Mean nanohardness and elastic modulus were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Scheffé test.
Results:
Locations 1 and 5 μm from the enamel surface had significantly (P < 0.05) lower nanohardness and elastic modulus values for the conventional system compared with the self-etching system and the unetched region. All other locations for the conventional system and all locations for the self-etching system and unetched area had no significant differences. The nanohardness was much higher than the Vickers hardness for enamel.
Conclusions:
The minimal effect of the self-etching system on the nanomechanical properties of enamel arises from much lower chemical attack. The much greater effects of the conventional system require further study.
