Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Testing dynamical models of vision.

Johannes Rüter1, Gregory Francis, Patricia Frehe

  • 1Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. johannes.ruter@epfl.ch

Vision Research
|December 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Silver bullets and sensory horizons.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Examining the relationship between ssVEP and psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity, grating acuity, and orientation discrimination.

iScience·2026
Same author

Systematic Evaluation Defines the Limits of Ferroptosis in Cancer Therapy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Low experimental power makes a crisis in visual attention inevitable, but easy to address.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Starting a revolution with a refuted model?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025

Current vision models inadequately explain spatio-temporal processing. Psychophysical tests of the shine-through effect revealed that neither the 3D-LAMINART nor the WCTM model accurately predicts experimental outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Vision

Background:

  • Models of visual processing often compartmentalize spatial and temporal aspects.
  • Research indicates that spatial and temporal visual processing are intrinsically linked.
  • The shine-through effect is a key phenomenon for studying integrated spatio-temporal perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To psychophysically evaluate predictions derived from computational models of the shine-through effect.
  • To test the validity of the 3D-LAMINART and WCTM models against empirical data.
  • To investigate the limitations of current models in explaining complex visual phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical experiments were conducted to test specific predictions.
  • Stimulus variants of the shine-through effect were employed.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

  • Experimental results were compared against predictions from the 3D-LAMINART and WCTM models.

    • Main Results:

    • The study systematically tested predictions crucial for differentiating between the 3D-LAMINART and WCTM models.
    • Empirical data from psychophysical experiments did not align with the predictions of either model.
    • Both leading models failed to account for the observed outcomes in the shine-through effect variants.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing dynamical models, including 3D-LAMINART and WCTM, are insufficient to explain the full scope of the shine-through effect.
    • Further development of visual processing models is required to integrate spatial and temporal dynamics accurately.
    • The study highlights the need for more comprehensive models that capture the interplay between spatial and temporal visual information.