Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors01:20

Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors

Drug binding to proteins is a key aspect of pharmacokinetics and can influence a drug's distribution, absorption, and elimination in the body. Several factors, including the drug's physiochemical properties, protein concentration, disease states, and the number of binding sites on the protein, influence this process.
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be bound by...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors01:18

Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors

Drug binding to proteins is a complex phenomenon influenced by various drug-related factors, each playing a significant role in the interaction between drugs and proteins within the body.
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In contrast,...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Signatures of protein fold switching in the unfolded state.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

Biomolecular Condensates Act as Distinct Solvation Environments That Reshape Amino Acid p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> Values.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Learning molecular determinants of selective small-molecule partitioning across biomolecular condensates.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Cooperativity, dynamics, and the free-energy surfaces of charge-patterned IDPs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mechanistic Insights into Molecular Modifiers That Promote Urate Crystallization through Solute Assembly Regulation.

JACS Au·2026
Same author

Short RNA chaperones promote aggregation-resistant TDP-43 conformers to mitigate neurodegeneration.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding
09:14

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: August 22, 2016

Macromolecular crowding effects on protein-protein binding affinity and specificity.

Young C Kim1, Robert B Best, Jeetain Mittal

  • 1Center for Computational Materials Science, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA. yckim@dave.nrl.navy.mil

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|December 8, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Cells are densely packed with macromolecules, and this crowding can influence how proteins interact. This study investigates how macromolecular crowding affects the binding of protein complexes. Using a computational model, the researchers found that crowding slightly reduces binding free energy. They also discovered that crowding increases the proportion of specific complexes while decreasing nonspecific ones. The study uses a transferable energy function and spherical crowders to simulate these effects. The results suggest that crowding can influence cellular processes by altering protein interaction specificity. These findings demonstrate that crowding has functional consequences beyond just affecting binding stability.

Keywords:
Protein binding affinityMacromolecular crowdingProtein interaction modelingCellular environment effects

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Analysis of Protein Complex Formation at Micromolar Concentrations by Coupling Microfluidics with Mass Photometry
06:39

Analysis of Protein Complex Formation at Micromolar Concentrations by Coupling Microfluidics with Mass Photometry

Published on: January 26, 2024

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding
09:14

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: August 22, 2016

Analysis of Protein Complex Formation at Micromolar Concentrations by Coupling Microfluidics with Mass Photometry
06:39

Analysis of Protein Complex Formation at Micromolar Concentrations by Coupling Microfluidics with Mass Photometry

Published on: January 26, 2024

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology within biophysics
  • Protein interaction studies in molecular biology
  • Computational modeling in biochemistry

Background:

Biological systems are densely packed with macromolecules, yet how this crowding influences protein interactions remains poorly quantified. Existing knowledge shows that macromolecular crowding can alter the physical properties of cellular environments. However, the precise effects on protein-protein binding remain unclear. Prior research has shown that crowding can influence diffusion and association rates. But no prior work had resolved how crowding affects binding specificity and affinity. This gap motivated the need for a quantitative model. That uncertainty drove the development of residue-level simulations. No prior work had resolved the functional consequences of crowding on specific versus nonspecific complexes. This gap motivated the current investigation into macromolecular crowding effects.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to quantify how macromolecular crowding affects the binding affinity and specificity of protein complexes. The specific problem is the lack of predictive models for crowding effects on protein interactions. The motivation stems from the functional importance of protein-protein interactions in cellular processes. The researchers propose to use a coarse-grained computational model. They aim to test whether crowding alters binding free energy and specificity. The study also seeks to assess whether crowding favors specific over nonspecific complexes. The authors propose to use a transferable energy function and spherical crowders. Their goal is to derive a quantitative model without fitting parameters.

Main Methods:

The researchers employed a residue-level coarse-grained model to simulate protein interactions. They used a fully transferable energy function to describe protein-protein interactions. Spherical crowders were introduced to mimic the cellular environment. The crowders interacted repulsively with protein residues. The model included two protein complexes: ubiquitin/UIM1 and cytochrome c/cytochrome c peroxidase. Protein complexes were mapped onto spheres based on excluded volume calculations. The scaled particle theory model was used to predict binding free energy changes. The model required no fitting parameters and used an additivity ansatz for mixed crowders.

Main Results:

The binding free energy of ubiquitin/UIM1 and cytochrome c/cytochrome c peroxidase decreased slightly with crowder concentration. The scaled particle theory model accurately predicted these changes without fitting parameters. The model also predicted the effects of mixed crowders using an additivity assumption. The study found that crowding increased the fraction of specific complexes. Nonspecific transient complexes decreased in proportion under crowding conditions. This shift was attributed to the greater excluded volume of nonspecific complexes. The results suggest that crowding can influence binding specificity. The findings demonstrate that crowding has functional consequences beyond binding stability.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that macromolecular crowding subtly affects protein binding specificity. They suggest that crowding increases the proportion of specific complexes at the expense of nonspecific ones. The scaled particle theory model accurately predicted these effects without fitting parameters. The results indicate that crowding can influence functional outcomes of protein interactions. The model's success with mixed crowders supports its applicability to real cellular environments. The findings suggest that crowding may play a role in cellular regulation. The authors propose that these effects arise from differences in excluded volume. The study demonstrates that crowding can have functional consequences beyond binding stability.

The study shows that crowding increases the fraction of specific complexes by reducing nonspecific transient interactions.

A residue-level coarse-grained model with spherical crowders and a transferable energy function was used.

The model uses excluded volume calculations and requires no fitting parameters to describe crowding effects.

Nonspecific complexes decrease in proportion under crowding due to their greater excluded volume.

The model used an additivity ansatz to predict effects of mixed crowders without fitting parameters.

The authors propose that crowding may influence cellular regulation by altering binding specificity.