Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: current trends and future directions
S Jacob1, A S Bharadwaj, S S Panaich
1Division of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center Detroit, MI 48201, USA. jacobsony@yahoo.com
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) faces challenges in patient selection and management, despite established guidelines. Future research should focus on improving patient selection and developing innovative CRT approaches for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated for heart failure but has unresolved issues.
- High non-response rates necessitate re-evaluation of current CRT practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current trends and challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- To discuss patient selection, procedural aspects, and post-implantation management in CRT.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on patient selection criteria, procedural techniques, and management strategies for CRT.
- Discussion of QRS duration, imaging for dyssynchrony, and CRT in specific patient groups (asymptomatic, atrial fibrillation).
Main Results:
- Patient selection for CRT requires critical appraisal, particularly regarding QRS duration and imaging for ventricular dyssynchrony.
- The role of CRT in asymptomatic patients and those with atrial fibrillation remains undefined.
- Optimizing surgical techniques, pacing site localization, and programming are crucial for advancing CRT.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to address controversies in CRT, including developing prediction tools for responders and exploring 'leadless' pacing.
- Innovative approaches and goal-directed research are essential to improve CRT efficacy and patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Despite the clear cut indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) laid down by guideline forming bodies, there are numerous unresolved issues. This review article primarily focuses on the current trends in CRT and the challenges encountered in patient selection, procedure related and postimplantation patient management issues. The high rate of non-response to CRT warrants a critical appraisal of the patient selection criteria, with the role of QRS duration and use of imaging to quantify ventricular dyssynchrony being the major points of discussion. Likewise the role of CRT in relatively asymptomatic heart failure patients, those with atrial fibrillation and the benefits of providing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator backup to all CRT devices has yet to be clearly defined. The development of effective and minimally invasive surgical techniques, dependable and reproducible means for optimal pacing site localization and comparative trials on superior mode of lead positioning, pacing sites and optimized CRT programming encompassing diverse patient populations would further advance current standards of CRT. Innovative approaches to resolve these controversies and future goal directed research is needed. Development of novel, comprehensive prediction tools to identify responders to CRT and the possibility of 'leadless' pacing would be interesting futuristic prospects.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

