Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

A S Detsky1, I G Naglie

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Toronto General Hospital, Ontario.

Annals of Internal Medicine
|July 15, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do you come to work with a respiratory tract infection?

Occupational and environmental medicine·2009
Same author

What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? 1987. Classical article.

Nutricion hospitalaria·2008
Same author

Effect of restricting contact between pharmaceutical company representatives and internal medicine residents on posttraining attitudes and behavior.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Screening for colon cancer--can we afford colonoscopy?

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

The application of decision analysis to the surgical treatment of early osteoarthritis of the wrist.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2001
Same author

Recruiting researchers.

Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale·2001
Same journal

The Role of Telemedicine on Interhospital Transfer Outcomes : A Systematic Review.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Prolonged Short Sleep and Its Effect on Body Weight and Composition : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

In AF, LAAC was noninferior to NOAC therapy for a composite efficacy outcome and reduced non-procedure-related bleeding at 3 y.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

How AI is affecting medical journals.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

In adults with COPD, the BLISS score predicted risk for acute respiratory hospital admission at 2 y.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

In AF at risk for stroke and bleeding, LAAC was not noninferior to medical therapy for a composite of thromboembolic and safety events.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) aids health care funding by comparing intervention costs and outcomes. Ranking incremental cost-effectiveness ratios helps maximize population health benefits within a budget.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Public health policy
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Healthcare funding decisions require systematic evaluation of interventions.
  • Prioritizing resource allocation is crucial for maximizing population health outcomes.
  • Clinicians' perspectives may differ from policymakers' regarding resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the role of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in healthcare priority setting.
  • To demonstrate how CEA can inform resource allocation decisions.
  • To highlight the importance of understanding CEA for clinicians involved in policy.

Main Methods:

  • Comparing costs and clinical outcomes of alternative health interventions.
  • Calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for interventions.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ranking ICERs to inform funding priorities and maximize population health benefit.

    • Main Results:

    • CEA provides a framework for ranking health interventions based on their economic value.
    • Calculating ICERs allows for objective comparison of strategies with different costs and outcomes.
    • Resource allocation guided by CEA can optimize net health benefit for a given budget.

    Conclusions:

    • Cost-effectiveness analysis is a vital tool for evidence-based healthcare priority setting.
    • Understanding CEA enables clinicians to contribute effectively to health policy decisions.
    • CEA clarifies the consequences of resource allocation choices, promoting transparency.