Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Quantitative Glycomics and Proteomics Combined Purification Strategy
Published on: March 8, 2016
Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample
Jacek R Wiśniewski1, Dorota F Zielinska, Matthias Mann
1Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. jwisniew@biochem.mpg.de
Abstract:
The filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method allows gel-free processing of biological samples solubilized with detergents for proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry. In FASP detergents are removed by ultrafiltration, and after protein digestion peptides are separated from undigested material. Here we compare the effectiveness of different filtration devices for analysis of proteomes and glycoproteomes. We show that Microcon and Vivacon filtration units with nominal molecular weight cutoffs of 30,000 and 50,000 (30 and 50k, respectively) are equally suitable for FASP, whereas Microcon 30k units are most appropriate for mapping of N-glycosylation sites. The use of filters with these relatively large cutoffs facilitates depletion of detergents.
More Related Videos
11:12Organic Solvent-Based Protein Precipitation for Robust Proteome Purification Ahead of Mass Spectrometry
Published on: February 7, 2022
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014