Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Countermovement jump and vertical hop demonstrate braking/deceleration and performance alterations after ACL reconstruction with BMA, DBM, and suture tape augmentation.

Journal of orthopaedics·2024

Same author

Successful rehabilitation and release of a powerful owl chick with suspected rodenticide poisoning.

Australian veterinary journal·2023

Same author

Management of perceived devastating brain injury after hospital admission: a consensus statement from stakeholder professional organizations.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018

Same author

Reducing the risk of mouth-to-mouth transmission of pathogens via re-usable, machine-read parking tickets: an observational cohort study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2017

Same author

Development, validation and initial outcomes of a questionnaire to examine human factors in postgraduate surgical objective structured clinical examinations.

The British journal of surgery·2015

Same author

Facial palsies: selection of cases for treatment.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010

Same journal

Peptides: FDA appointed advisory committee criticised for conflicts of interest.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same journal

Hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship is over, say officials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same journal

BMA recommends that 16 and 17 year olds get access to cross sex hormones.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same journal

Andy Burnham could apply lessons from Manchester to create a healthier Britain with a stronger economy.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same journal

Uganda confirms Marburg case as Ebola outbreak continues.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same journal

Australia increases penalties for social media companies to enforce under 16s ban.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

Published on: April 28, 2022

Bicycle weight and commuting time: randomised trial.

¹Department of Anaesthetics, Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Calow, Chesterfield, UK. jeremy.groves@nhs.net

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)

|December 15, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A lighter carbon frame bicycle did not significantly reduce commuting time compared to a heavier steel frame bicycle. Cyclists may benefit more from personal weight reduction than investing in lighter bikes.

More Related Videos

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice

Published on: April 28, 2022

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

Area of Science:

Sports Science and Biomechanics
Human Performance and Exercise Physiology

Background:

Bicycle weight is often considered a key factor in cycling performance.
The perceived benefit of lighter bicycles in reducing travel time warrants scientific investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the commuting time between a lightweight carbon frame bicycle and a heavier steel frame bicycle.
To assess the impact of bicycle mass on overall journey duration for a fixed commute.

Main Methods:

A randomized trial was conducted over six months.
The study involved a single participant, a consultant in anaesthesia and intensive care.
Commuting time was measured for a 27-mile (43.5 km) round trip between Sheffield and Chesterfield.

Main Results:

The mean journey time difference between the steel and carbon bicycles was negligible (32 seconds).
The 95% confidence interval for the time difference included zero (-3 minutes 34 seconds to 2 minutes 30 seconds), indicating no statistically significant difference.
The carbon frame bicycle was ridden for 711 miles (1144 km) and the steel frame bicycle for 809 miles (1302 km) during the study.

Conclusions:

A lighter bicycle did not result in a detectable reduction in commuting time.
The findings suggest that personal weight management may offer a more cost-effective strategy for improving cycling efficiency than purchasing lighter equipment.
Further research with larger sample sizes could explore nuanced effects of bicycle weight across different cycling disciplines and rider profiles.