Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically
Published on: September 9, 2015
Telavancin versus vancomycin for hospital-acquired pneumonia due to gram-positive pathogens
Ethan Rubinstein1, Tahaniyat Lalani, G Ralph Corey
1Section of Infectious Diseases Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. rubinste@cc.umanitoba.ca
Background:
Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens.
Methods:
Two methodologically identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) were conducted involving patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to gram-positive pathogens, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients were randomized 1:1 to telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) for 7-21 days. The primary end point was clinical response at follow-up/test-of-cure visit.
Results:
A total of 1503 patients were randomized and received study medication (the all-treated population). In the pooled all-treated population, cure rates with telavancin versus vancomycin were 58.9% versus 59.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -5.6% to 4.3%). In the pooled clinically evaluable population (n = 654), cure rates were 82.4% with telavancin and 80.7% with vancomycin (95% CI for the difference, -4.3% to 7.7%). Treatment with telavancin achieved higher cure rates in patients with monomicrobial S. aureus infection and comparable cure rates in patients with MRSA infection; in patients with mixed gram-positive/gram-negative infections, cure rates were higher in the vancomycin group. Incidence and types of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. Mortality rates for telavancin-treated versus vancomycin-treated patients were 21.5% versus 16.6% (95% CI for the difference, -0.7% to 10.6%) for study 0015 and 18.5% versus 20.6% (95% CI for the difference, -7.8% to 3.5%) for study 0019. Increases in serum creatinine level were more common in the telavancin group (16% vs 10%).
Conclusions:
The primary end point of the studies was met, indicating that telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin on the basis of clinical response in the treatment of HAP due to gram-positive pathogens.
Insights
Telavancin demonstrated noninferiority to vancomycin for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by gram-positive pathogens. Clinical cure rates were comparable between the two antibiotics in this large-scale study.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic effective against gram-positive bacteria.
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a serious infection often caused by challenging pathogens like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of telavancin versus vancomycin for treating HAP.
- To determine if telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin in achieving clinical response.
Main Methods:
- Two identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) enrolled patients with HAP.
- Patients received either telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) for 7-21 days.
- The primary endpoint was clinical response assessed at follow-up/test-of-cure.
Main Results:
- A total of 1503 patients were included in the analysis.
- Pooled cure rates were 58.9% for telavancin and 59.5% for vancomycin (all-treated population).
- Telavancin showed higher cure rates in monomicrobial S. aureus infections but comparable rates in MRSA infections. Increased creatinine levels were more frequent with telavancin.
Conclusions:
- Telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin for treating HAP caused by gram-positive pathogens.
- The study met its primary endpoint, supporting telavancin as an alternative treatment option.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
