Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Culturally-attuned AI: Implicit learning of altruistic cultural values through inverse reinforcement learning.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Predictive coding with spiking neural networks: A survey.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025
Same author

Average of Baseline Autocorrelation Function is a Leading Indicator of Neural Stimulation Data Quality.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Learning Temporal Basis Vectors for Closed-Loop Neural Stimulation.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

A survey on neuro-mimetic deep learning via predictive coding.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Decision making under uncertainty: a neural model based on partially observable markov decision processes.

Rajesh P N Rao1

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering and Neurobiology and Behavior Program, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
|December 15, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a neural model for decision-making, showing how the brain uses belief states for action selection. It integrates information gathering and action, explaining neural activity and learning.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferencebasal gangliadecision theorydopamineparietal cortexprobabilistic modelsreinforcement learningtemporal difference learning

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Animals face challenges in selecting actions with noisy sensory data and incomplete world knowledge.
  • While Bayesian inference is linked to perception, its role in action selection remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a neural model for action selection and decision-making based on partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs).
  • To unify explanations for experimental findings in decision-making involving information gathering and overt actions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a neural model using POMDP theory and temporal difference (TD) learning for reward maximization.
  • Modeled action selection based on posterior state distributions (belief states) rather than single optimal estimates.
  • Investigated neural architecture involving neocortex and basal ganglia roles in belief computation, representation, value computation, and action selection.

Main Results:

  • Model neurons show belief responses similar to primate neocortical LIP neurons in motion discrimination tasks.
  • The model naturally derives thresholds for switching between information gathering and action during reward maximization.
  • Reward prediction error in the model aligns with basal ganglia dopaminergic responses.
  • The model predicts a collapsing decision threshold for time-sensitive tasks, consistent with experimental data.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model offers a novel framework for understanding neural decision-making.
  • It highlights the crucial role of neocortex-basal ganglia interactions in linking probabilistic representations to reward-maximizing actions.