Time-lag bias in trials of pediatric antidepressants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Magdalena M Reyes1, Kaitlyn E Panza, Andrés Martin
1Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Insights
Publication bias delays negative pediatric antidepressant trial results, skewing perceived efficacy. This time-lag bias affects medical literature and highlights broader scientific publishing issues.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pediatric depression treatment relies on evidence from clinical trials.
- Publication bias, the tendency to publish positive results over negative ones, can distort the scientific record.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate time-lag bias in the publication of pediatric antidepressant trials.
- To assess the impact of publication timing on the perceived efficacy of these treatments.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) for pediatric depression was conducted.
- Publication times for positive versus negative trials were compared.
- Treatment responder proportions in trials with standard versus delayed publication were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Trials with negative findings had a significantly longer time to publication (4.2 years) compared to positive trials (2.2 years).
- The estimated efficacy was significantly greater in trials with standard publication (NNT=7) versus delayed publication (NNT=17).
- Journal impact factors did not differ significantly between published positive and negative trials.
Conclusions:
- Significant evidence of time-lag bias was found in pediatric antidepressant trials.
- This bias inflates the apparent efficacy of these treatments in the medical literature.
- Time-lag bias is a systemic issue in scientific publishing, not limited to child psychiatry.
Objective:
To determine whether there is evidence of a time-lag bias in the publication of pediatric antidepressant trials.
Method:
We conducted a meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized placebo-controlled trials of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) in subjects less than 18 years of age with major depressive disorder. Our main outcomes were (1) time to publication of positive versus negative trials, and (2) proportion of treatment responders in trials with standard (<3 years after study completion) versus delayed publication.
Results:
We identified 15 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of SRIs for pediatric depression. Trials with negative findings had a significantly longer time to publication (median years ± standard deviation = 4.2 ± 1.9) than trials with positive findings (2.2 ± 0.9; log-rank χ(2) = 4.35, p = .037). The estimated efficacy in trials with standard publication time (number needed to treat = 7, 95% CI = 5-11) was significantly greater than those with delayed publication (17, 95% CI = 9-∞; χ(2) = 4.98, p = .025). The inflation-adjusted impact factor of journals for published trials with positive (15.33 ± 11.01) and negative results (7.54 ± 7.90) did not statistically differ (t = 1.4, df = 10, p = .17).
Conclusions:
Despite a small number of trials of SRIs for pediatric antidepressants, we found a significant evidence of time-lag bias in the publication of findings. This time-lag bias altered the perceived efficacy of pediatric antidepressants in the medical literature. Time-lag bias is not unique to child psychiatry and reflects a larger problem in scientific publishing.
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over time, all...
Long-term Depression
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview

