Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

07:56
Evaluating Regional Pulmonary Deposition using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Lung Models
Published on: November 11, 2020
Use of a realistic breathing lung phantom to evaluate dose delivery errors
Laurence E Court1, Joao Seco, Xing-Qi Lu
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. lecourt@mdanderson.org
Medical Physics
|December 17, 2010
Summary
Respiration-induced motion can cause dose deviations in radiation therapy, but these effects average out over several fractions for most techniques. Complex treatment plans and single-arc VMAT may show larger deviations, which can be mitigated by reducing dose rate or using double arcs.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Respiration-induced motion is a significant challenge in radiation therapy, potentially causing dose deviations.
- The interplay effect, where motion affects dose delivery, requires careful evaluation for different treatment techniques.
- Realistic phantoms and dosimetry measurements are crucial for assessing treatment accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of respiration-induced motion on delivered radiation dose for various treatment techniques.
- To evaluate the interplay effect under clinically relevant conditions using a realistic phantom.
- To determine the dose deviations for different radiotherapy plans and their dependence on fractionation.
Main Methods:
- A 3D-printed tumor model was created from patient CT data and placed in an anthropomorphic breathing phantom.
- Micro-MOSFETs were used to measure dose distribution within the tumor model under simulated patient motion.
- Multiple treatment plans were generated using conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques.
Main Results:
- Most treatment plans showed dose deviations less than 2% after five fractions, except for complex dynamic IMRT, step-and-shoot IMRT (XiO), complex VMAT, and single-arc VMAT.
- Reducing the dose rate for complex IMRT plans significantly decreased dose deviations.
- Complex single-arc VMAT plans exhibited dose deviations exceeding 5% after five fractions.
Conclusions:
- Rapid prototyping enables creation of realistic tumor models for motion studies.
- Dose deviations due to motion generally average out with fractionation for most techniques.
- Complex treatment sequences increase dose deviations; reducing dose rate for IMRT and using double arcs for VMAT can improve accuracy.

