Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Two-stage total hip arthroplasty: how often does it control methicillin-resistant infection?
Fay Leung1, Corey J Richards, Donald S Garbuz
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3114-910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E3, Canada.
Background:
Methicillin-resistant hip infections are increasingly common. Reports of the surgical management of these patients using two-stage THA show variable control of infection, but all reports used static spacers.
Questions/Purposes:
We therefore determined (1) the rate of successful control of infection and (2) function in patients with methicillin-resistant infection treated with a two-stage THA using an articulated cement spacer during the first stage.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who had a two-stage revision THA for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infection. Twelve patients died, leaving 38 for review. All eligible patients completed quality-of-life outcome questionnaires (WOMAC, SF-12, Oxford-12, UCLA activity score, hip and knee satisfaction score). Minimum followup was 24 months after the second stage (mean, 58 months; range, 24-123 months).
Results:
Of the 38 patients, eight (21%) had recurrence of their infection requiring further revision surgery. Of the remaining 27 patients, the mean WOMAC was 62, mean Oxford-12 60, mean UCLA activity score 4.3, and mean hip and knee satisfaction score 66.
Conclusions:
We found a treatment failure rate of 21% for patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus or methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis infection. This is a higher rate than reported for two-stage THA for studies including patients infected with both nonresistant and resistant organisms. The functional scores for patients were also lower than those reported in the literature.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Insights
Two-stage total hip arthroplasty (THA) using articulated cement spacers for methicillin-resistant hip infections showed a 21% failure rate. Functional outcomes were lower than previously reported, indicating challenges in managing these complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease Management
- Biomaterials in Arthroplasty
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant hip infections are a growing clinical challenge.
- Existing two-stage total hip arthroplasty (THA) methods for these infections often use static spacers with variable success.
- Novel approaches are needed to improve infection control and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a two-stage THA employing an articulated cement spacer for methicillin-resistant hip infections.
- To determine the rate of successful infection control after this surgical approach.
- To assess patient functional outcomes and quality of life following treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 50 patients undergoing two-stage THA for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or epidermidis hip infections.
- Analysis of 38 patients (after 12 deaths) with a minimum 24-month follow-up post-second stage.
- Collection of quality-of-life data using WOMAC, SF-12, Oxford-12, UCLA activity, and satisfaction scores.
Main Results:
- A 21% recurrence rate of infection was observed, necessitating further revision surgery.
- Among the remaining patients, functional scores were generally lower than those reported in prior literature.
- Mean WOMAC score was 62, Oxford-12 was 60, UCLA activity score was 4.3, and satisfaction score was 66.
Conclusions:
- The two-stage THA with an articulated cement spacer demonstrated a 21% treatment failure rate for methicillin-resistant hip infections.
- This failure rate is higher compared to studies including both resistant and non-resistant organisms.
- Functional outcomes in this cohort were suboptimal, highlighting the difficulty in managing these specific infections.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
