Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inclusive Search for Anomalous Single-Photon Production in MicroBooNE.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Bouldering-related trauma: Injury patterns and operative burden over 10 years at a UK major trauma centre.

Injury·2026
Same author

Dual-action antibacterial mechanism of a ferrocene-pyrazoline hybrid: Michael acceptor electrophilicity and redox-active nonclassical bonding.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same author

First Search for Dark Sector e^{+}e^{-} Explanations of the MiniBooNE Anomaly at MicroBooNE.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of two aquatic safety skill assessment tools.

JSAMS plus·2026
Same author

First Measurement of Charged-Current Muon-Neutrino-Induced K^{+} Production on Argon Using the MicroBooNE Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

TGF-β signaling regulates flat epithelium formation in severely injured adult mouse utricle through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Membrane scaffolding in auditory hair cells - a molecular tightrope walk enables lateral wall stiffness and flexibility.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Speech-in-noise recognition during hearing protector use: Human performance and acoustic prediction.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of minor-to-moderate conductive hearing loss with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Voice discrimination in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.

Z Massida1, P Belin, C James

  • 1Université Toulouse, CerCo, Université Paul Sabatier, 133 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.

Hearing Research
|December 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implants (CI) impair voice discrimination by altering spectral cues. Even after two years, CI users show persistent deficits in voice perception, unlike speech perception recovery, suggesting crossmodal reorganization may be involved.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Speech and Hearing Sciences

Background:

  • Human voice perception is crucial for social communication, conveying speech and paralinguistic information.
  • Specific temporal cortical regions are vital for processing voice characteristics.
  • Cochlear implant (CI) processors modify spectral cues, impacting the perception of voice information in deafened individuals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate voice discrimination abilities in cochlear implant (CI) users.
  • To compare CI users' voice discrimination with normal-hearing subjects (NHS) using a cochlear implant simulation (vocoder).
  • To investigate the impact of CI use duration on voice discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a vocoder simulation to reduce spectral information in normal-hearing subjects (NHS).
  • Assessed voice discrimination performance in cochlear implant (CI) patients at different time points post-implantation.
  • Compared voice discrimination abilities between CI users and NHS.

Main Results:

  • In NHS, voice discrimination performance declined with reduced spectral information (fewer vocoder channels).
  • CI users exhibited significant voice discrimination impairments immediately after CI activation.
  • No substantial improvement in voice discrimination was observed even after two years of CI use, despite speech perception recovery.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear implantation significantly impairs voice discrimination due to altered spectral cues and potential crossmodal reorganization.
  • A dissociation exists between the recovery dynamics of speech perception and voice processing in CI users.
  • The findings suggest that temporal voice areas may undergo crossmodal reorganization in CI patients, contributing to voice discrimination deficits.