Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

10:27
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
Published on: February 20, 2014
Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect
Maria Augustinova1, Valentin Flaudias, Ludovic Ferrand
1University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France. maria.augustinova@univ-bpclermont.fr
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|December 21, 2010
Summary
Semantic activation in the Stroop task is automatic. Experiments show that coloring or cuing a single letter does not eliminate the Stroop effect, supporting automatic semantic processing.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- The automaticity of semantic activation in the Stroop task remains a debated topic.
- Previous research has yielded conflicting results regarding the elimination of Stroop interference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether manipulating visual cues in the Stroop task reliably eliminates semantic interference.
- To determine if prior findings of interference elimination were due to insufficient statistical power.
Main Methods:
- Replication of a previous experiment (Manwell et al.) with a large sample size.
- An additional experiment controlling for initial fixation.
- Utilizing the Stroop task with single-letter coloring and cuing manipulations.
Main Results:
- Coloring and cuing a single letter failed to eliminate the semantic Stroop effect.
- The Stroop effect was not reduced, even with a large sample size and controlled fixation.
- Results align with findings suggesting automatic semantic activation.
Conclusions:
- Semantic activation in the Stroop task is automatic and robust.
- The Stroop effect cannot be eliminated by single-letter manipulations.
- Findings contribute to the evidence base for automatic semantic processing in cognitive tasks.

