Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
05:06
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
Pediatric laparoscopy: Facts and factitious claims
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
|December 21, 2010
Summary
Pediatric laparoscopy (LS) is not proven to be superior to open surgery (OS) in children. Evidence suggests LS may be as or more invasive, with no clear benefits in complications or cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- The perceived superiority of pediatric laparoscopy (LS) over open surgery (OS) is widely claimed.
- This review critically evaluates the scientific evidence supporting these claims in pediatric patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze published evidence comparing pediatric laparoscopy (LS) and open surgery (OS).
- To assess the scientific veracity of claims regarding LS superiority in infants and children.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted.
- Analysis of available literature specifically on pediatric laparoscopy was performed.
Main Results:
- 108 articles were selected for detailed review from a total of 426 papers.
- High-quality evidence does not support LS as minimally invasive or more cost-effective than OS.
- Evidence regarding postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes is inconclusive or lacking.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric laparoscopy (LS) is comparable to open surgery (OS), with no proven superiority.
- Evidence does not support claims of reduced invasiveness, fewer complications, or economic benefits of LS.
- Concerns exist regarding the rapid adoption and potential misuse of LS in pediatric surgery, especially in younger children.
