Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Conversation with Jacob Nachmias.

Annual review of vision science·2019

Same author

Judging spatial properties of simple figures.

Vision research·2008

Same author

The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination.

Vision research·2006

Same author

Contrast discrimination with and without spatial uncertainty.

Vision research·2002

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Shape and size discrimination compared.

Jacob Nachmias¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. nachmias@psych.upenn.edu

Vision Research

|December 22, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Visual perception of size and shape relies on both height and width. Shape discrimination is superior to size discrimination, likely due to correlated visual encoding, impacting how we perceive object dimensions.

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Area of Science:

Visual Perception
Psychophysics
Cognitive Science

Background:

Human observers analyze geometric figures based on dimensions like area (SIZE) and aspect ratio (SHAPE).
Previous research indicates that observers utilize both height and width information when discriminating between figures.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how observers discriminate between figures varying in SIZE and SHAPE.
To determine the influence of correlated visual noise on SIZE and SHAPE discrimination.
To examine the effect of presentation mode (successive vs. simultaneous) on discrimination performance.

Main Methods:

Observers were presented with pairs of figures differing in SIZE or SHAPE.
Participants were sometimes instructed or cued to focus on specific dimensions.
Discrimination accuracy was measured under successive and simultaneous presentation conditions.

Main Results:

SHAPE discrimination was significantly better than SIZE discrimination.
Height discrimination accuracy was modulated by width differences, with negative correlations improving performance.
The difference between SIZE and SHAPE discrimination decreased under simultaneous presentation compared to successive presentation.

Conclusions:

Visual perception of SIZE and SHAPE involves the integrated use of height and width information.
Partial correlation in encoding noise between dimensions enhances SHAPE discrimination.
The presentation mode significantly interacts with the discrimination of SIZE and SHAPE, potentially due to altered noise correlations.