Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Second Order systems II01:18

Second Order systems II

In an underdamped second-order system, where the damping ratio ζ is between 0 and 1, a unit-step input results in a transfer function that, when transformed using the inverse Laplace method, reveals the output response. The output exhibits a damped sinusoidal oscillation, and the difference between the input and output is termed the error signal. This error signal also demonstrates damped oscillatory behavior. Eventually, as the system reaches a steady state, the error diminishes to zero.
If  ζ...
First Order Systems01:21

First Order Systems

First-order systems, such as RC circuits, are foundational in understanding dynamic systems due to their straightforward input-output relationship. Analyzing their responses to different input functions under zero initial conditions reveals significant insights into system behavior.
When a first-order system is subjected to a unit-step input, its response is characterized by its transfer function. By applying the Laplace transform of the unit-step input to the transfer function, expanding the...
Transient and Steady-state Response01:24

Transient and Steady-state Response

In control systems, test signals are essential for evaluating performance under various conditions. The ramp function is effective for systems undergoing gradual changes, while the step function is suitable for assessing systems facing sudden disturbances. For systems subjected to shock inputs, the impulse function is the most appropriate test signal.
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state response.
RL Circuit with Source01:14

RL Circuit with Source

When an RL (Resistor-Inductor) circuit is connected to a DC source, the complete response of the circuit can be divided into two parts: the transient response and the steady-state response.
The transient response of the circuit is its temporary reaction to the sudden application of the DC source. This response is characterized by a current that exponentially decays to zero as time approaches infinity. During this transitional period, the inductor behaves like a short circuit, causing the source...
Deconvolution01:20

Deconvolution

Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
Types of Responses of Series RLC Circuits01:11

Types of Responses of Series RLC Circuits

A second-order differential equation characterizes a source-free series RLC circuit, marking its distinct mathematical representation. The complete solution of this equation is a blend of two unique solutions, each linked to the circuit's roots expressed in terms of the damping factor and resonant frequency.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global advances and future directions in lung cancer care: expert consensus and strategic priorities.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Data-driven cascade control system: Response estimation and controller design.

ISA transactions·2023
Same author

Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, in patients with pretreated germline BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer: results from a phase II basket study.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

Human papillomavirus infection and lung adenocarcinoma: special benefit is observed in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

Classification of atypical EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2022
Same author

ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2022
Same journal

Composite fault-tolerant predictive control strategy for PMSM demagnetization faults.

ISA transactions·2026
Same journal

Bias-compensated Q-learning for optimal tracking control under denial-of-service attacks.

ISA transactions·2026
Same journal

Motion prediction for leader manipulator of teleoperation system with large time delay based on inverse optimal control.

ISA transactions·2026
Same journal

Neural network parameter identification-based prescribed-time adaptive control for morphing glide aircraft.

ISA transactions·2026
Same journal

Nonlinear system-guided continuous-time generalization for cross-aircraft engine state monitoring.

ISA transactions·2026
Same journal

Predefined-time distributed optimal formation control for constrained UAV-UGV systems.

ISA transactions·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

Second order inverse response process identification from transient step response.

P Balaguer1, V Alfaro, O Arrieta

  • 1Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes Industrials i Disseny, Universitat Jaume I de Castelló, E-12080 Castelló de la Plana, Spain. pbalague@uji.es

ISA Transactions
|December 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a straightforward method for identifying inverse response models from plant step response data. The new algorithm simplifies parameter estimation for second-order systems, avoiding complex nonlinear equation solving.

More Related Videos

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Process Control
  • System Identification
  • Chemical Engineering

Background:

  • Identifying inverse response models is crucial for process control.
  • Analytical solutions for inverse response models often require solving complex nonlinear equations.
  • Existing methods can be computationally intensive and lack flexibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simple and effective algorithm for identifying second-order inverse response models.
  • To provide a sequential parameter estimation method that avoids solving nonlinear systems.
  • To offer flexibility in algorithm performance and provide error bounds for control design.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes the plant's step response data.
  • A sequential algorithm is employed for parameter estimation.
  • The procedure is designed to be adaptable to specific user requirements.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm successfully identifies parameters for second-order inverse response models.
  • The sequential approach bypasses the need for solving coupled nonlinear equations.
  • Error bounds for the identified parameters are determined, enhancing model utility for control design.

Conclusions:

  • The developed identification procedure offers a simplified approach to modeling inverse response processes.
  • The algorithm's flexibility and provision of error bounds make it valuable for control applications.
  • This method provides a practical alternative for system identification in process engineering.