Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Planning what not to eat: ironic effects of implementation intentions negating unhealthy habits
Marieke A Adriaanse1, Johanna M F van Oosten, Denise T D de Ridder
1Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.A.Adriaanse@uu.nl
Abstract:
The present studies tested the effectiveness of implementation intentions with an "if [situation], then not [habitual response]" structure. Based on ironic process theory and the literature on the processing of negations, it was expected that these "negation implementation intentions" would, ironically, strengthen the habit (situation-response association) one aims to break. In line with the hypotheses, forming negation implementation intentions resulted in cognitive ironic rebound effects as well as behavioral ironic rebound effects compared to an intention only condition or a replacement implementation intention. Additionally, it was found that negation implementation intentions are most likely to result in ironic rebound effects when the habit to be negated is strong. Although implementation intentions are generally highly effective in facilitating behavior change even when this involves breaking unwanted habits, the present research suggests that they are ineffective when they have a negating structure.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Confirmation Biases
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

