Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
False positive newborn screening results are not always benign
1Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Insights
False positive newborn screening results can cause significant parental stress and worry, impacting family decisions. Effective communication is crucial to mitigate these long-term effects.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric screening
- Public health
- Genetics
Background:
- Newborn screening (NBS) is vital for early detection of genetic disorders.
- Abnormal NBS results can cause distress for families, even with false positives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of abnormal newborn screening results on families.
- To understand the psychological effects on parents receiving false positive (FP) or true positive (TP) results.
Main Methods:
- Telephone interviews with parents of children with FP (n=28), TP (n=20), and FP with other conditions (FP+other, n=12) results.
- Utilized open/closed-ended questions and the Parental Stress Index (PSI).
Main Results:
- FP parents reported concerns about future pregnancies and communication issues.
- Parents of FP+other children experienced the highest stress, followed by TP children.
- Nearly 10% of FP parents reported clinically significant stress and worry.
Conclusions:
- False positive NBS results can lead to parental stress and long-term worry.
- Improved communication strategies are needed to reduce negative sequelae.
- Consideration of these effects is vital when expanding NBS panels.
Objective:
Our goal was to assess the impact on families of receiving abnormal newborn screening results.
Patients And Methods:
We conducted telephone interviews with parents of 3 groups of children who had received abnormal newborn screening results: (1) false positive but otherwise healthy (FP, n = 28), (2) true positive (TP, n = 20), and (3) false positive with other medical conditions (FP + other, n = 12). Interviews, based on the instruments developed by Waisbren et al. [J Pediatr Psychol 2004;29:565-570], included open- and close-ended questions as well as the Parental Stress Index (PSI).
Results:
In response to open ended questions, FP parents expressed concern about having more children and identified numerous problems with how they were told about newborn screening. Parents of FP + other reported the most stress, followed by parents of children with metabolic disease. Nonetheless, almost 10% of FP parents reported clinically significant stress as well as worry about their child's health and future.
Conclusions:
False positive newborn screening results cause some parents to experience stress and long-term worry. Although more work is needed to learn how well these sequelae can be averted by more effective communication in the pre- and postnatal periods, these effects need to be considered in deciding whether to add new disorders to newborn screening panels.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Teratogenicity
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
