Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Actor-Observer Effect

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Methylphenidate enhances or impairs the cognitive control of Pavlovian bias depending on working memory capacity.

eLife·2026

Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026

Same author

Effort Aversion and Reward Sensitivity in Schizophrenia: Computational Phenotyping of Motivational Deficits across Behavioral Tasks.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2026

Same author

Why is cognitive effort experienced as costly?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025

Same author

Abstract rule generalization for composing novel meaning recruits a frontoparietal control network.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

The brain that wouldn't know itself: Comment on 'The paradox of the self-studying brain' by Simone Battaglia, Philippe Servajean and Karl J. Friston.

Physics of life reviews·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.

Jean Daunizeau¹, Hanneke E M den Ouden, Matthias Pessiglione

¹Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College of London, London, United Kingdom. j.daunizeau@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

|December 24, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a meta-Bayesian framework to model decision-making under uncertainty. It quantifies subjective beliefs and preferences by analyzing reaction time data from an associative learning task.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Computational Neuroscience
Decision Theory

Background:

Decision-making under uncertainty relies on integrating prior beliefs with new information to form posterior beliefs.
Bayesian decision theory models choices using posterior beliefs and a loss (or utility) function.
Inter-individual differences in behavior arise from variations in subjective beliefs and preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

To implement and validate a meta-Bayesian approach for analyzing decision-making.
To model reaction time variability as a reflection of internal representational dynamics during learning.
To quantify subjective beliefs and preferences driving behavior and inter-individual differences.

Main Methods:

Developed a meta-Bayesian framework, a Bayesian treatment of Bayesian decision theory predictions.
Applied the framework to simulated and empirical reaction time data from an audio-visual associative learning task.
Modeled inter-trial reaction time variability using the dynamics of internal belief updating (posterior densities).

Main Results:

Demonstrated probabilistic inference on the dynamics of internal representations of environmental states.
Enabled model selection to distinguish between alternative subjective loss functions (preferences).
Quantified subjective beliefs and preferences underlying observed behavioral differences.

Conclusions:

The meta-Bayesian framework provides a powerful tool for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
It allows for detailed inference on the internal cognitive processes, including belief updating and preference formation.
This approach can elucidate the sources of inter-individual variability in human behavior.