Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

05:23
Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
Published on: March 11, 2021
Minimal detectable change for gait variables collected during treadmill walking in individuals post-stroke
Trisha M Kesar1, Stuart A Binder-Macleod, Gregory E Hicks
1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, United States.
Gait & Posture
|December 25, 2010
Summary
This study establishes minimal detectable change (MDC) values for gait variables in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. These MDCs help determine if gait improvements from rehabilitation are significant and not due to random variation.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Post-stroke gait impairments significantly affect mobility and community participation.
- Treadmill training is an effective rehabilitation strategy for improving gait post-stroke.
- Assessing gait performance often involves kinematic and kinetic data from treadmill walking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compute minimal detectable change (MDC) values for post-stroke gait kinematics, ground reaction force (GRF) indices, and spatial-temporal measures during treadmill walking.
- To provide a reference for interpreting the significance of gait changes following interventions.
- To address the lack of reported MDC values for these specific gait variables in the post-stroke population.
Main Methods:
- Nineteen individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis underwent two gait testing sessions on a treadmill.
- Gait variables including kinematics (joint angles), GRF, temporal, and spatial measures were collected.
- Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to calculate MDCs.
Main Results:
- Excellent test-retest reliability was observed for all tested gait variables (ICCs ranging from 0.799 to 0.986).
- Specific MDCs were reported for hip, knee, and ankle joint angles, peak anterior and mean vertical GRF, temporal variables, and paretic step length.
- Ranges for MDCs included joint angles (3.8°–11.5°), GRF (2.85%–4.65% body weight), temporal variables (3.2%–4.2% gait cycle), and paretic step length (6.7 cm).
Conclusions:
- The computed MDCs offer a crucial reference for clinicians and researchers.
- These values enable the differentiation of true gait improvements from measurement error or day-to-day variability.
- The findings support the use of these MDCs in evaluating the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation interventions post-stroke.

