Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.

Major Somatic Sensory Pathways

Major Somatic Sensory Pathways

Sensory impulses related to touch, pressure, vibration, and proprioception from various body parts, such as the limbs, trunk, neck, and posterior head, travel to the cerebral cortex through the posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway. The pathway’s name derives from the two white-matter tracts that convey the impulses: the spinal cord's posterior column and the brainstem's medial lemniscus. First-order sensory neurons extend their axons into the spinal cord, forming the posterior columns...

Observational Learning

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A perspective on neuromechanical biomarkers for neurorehabilitation: towards reliable assessment in research and clinical practice.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2026

Same author

Hybrid Kinematic and Muscular Null Space for Simultaneous Control of Natural and Extra Degrees of Freedom.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026

Same author

Structured modulations in high-density EMG patterns from a single muscle enable simultaneous control of natural and extra degrees of freedom.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same author

Usability, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Personalized Adaptive Mirror Therapy for Upper-Limb Poststroke Rehabilitation Using Immersive Virtual Reality and Myoelectric Control: Single-Arm Pre-Post Study.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2026

Same author

A modular architecture for trial-by-trial learning of redundant muscle activity patterns in novel sensorimotor tasks.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same author

A novel approach to promote upper-limb motor recovery in stroke survivors using assistive myoelectric control and adaptive visual feedback in virtual reality.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Modularity for sensorimotor control: evidence and a new prediction.

Andrea d'Avella¹, Dinesh K Pai

¹Santa Lucia Foundation, Neuromotor Physiology Laboratory, Rome, Italy. a.davella@hsantalucia.it

Journal of Motor Behavior

|December 25, 2010

Summary

The central nervous system (CNS) may learn motor control policies efficiently through modularity. A modular controller adapts faster to compatible perturbations than incompatible ones, supporting this theory.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Motor Control
Computational Neuroscience

Background:

The central nervous system's (CNS) ability to learn new motor control policies efficiently may rely on modular organization.
Evidence for modularity in the motor system includes observations of low dimensionality in motor commands.
Testing predictions of modularity in motor adaptation is crucial for stronger support.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the predictions of modularity in the context of motor adaptation.
To compare the adaptation speed of a modular controller versus a nonmodular controller when faced with perturbations.

Main Methods:

The study proposes testing the hypothesis that modular controllers adapt differently to compatible versus incompatible perturbations.
This involves analyzing the mechanisms required for modular control implementation.

Main Results:

A modular controller is predicted to adapt faster to perturbations compatible with existing modules.
Conversely, adaptation to incompatible perturbations, requiring new modules, is expected to be slower.

Conclusions:

The findings are expected to provide stronger evidence for a modular organization of the motor system.
This research contributes to understanding how the CNS achieves rapid and efficient motor learning.