Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine learning-based mortality prediction for pediatric fulminant myocarditis using cytokine profiles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Inferring relationships among major psychiatric disorders in a resting-state functional connectivity-informed embedding space.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Insula Structure Is Linked to Autonomic Cardiac Dysregulation in Depression.

Biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Identifying Physiological and Cognitive Indicators of Subthreshold Depression and Major Depressive Disorder Progression Risk.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment·2026
Same author

A computational model of canonical cortical microcircuits for dynamic Bayesian inference and control as inference.

Neuroscience research·2025
Same author

Metabolic profiles associated with fat loss in Parkinson's disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

Evidence for model-based action planning in a sequential finger movement task.

Alan Fermin1, Takehiko Yoshida, Makoto Ito

  • 1Neural Computation Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Japan. alan@oist.jp

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Humans utilize both reflexive and deliberative strategies for motor sequence learning. Findings suggest a model-based approach is key for learning new sequences by leveraging prior knowledge of action transitions.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Motor sequence learning involves both automatic and deliberate cognitive processes.
  • Understanding the interplay between model-free and model-based strategies is crucial for explaining human learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether humans employ model-free or model-based strategies in motor sequence learning.
  • To determine how these strategies are utilized during learning under varying task conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed the grid-sailing task, involving cursor navigation with key-mapping rules.
  • The task was executed under three conditions: new key-mapping, new goal with learned key-mapping, and learned goal with learned key-mapping.
  • The effect of prestart delay time on performance was analyzed across conditions.

Main Results:

  • Performance improvement was significantly greater under the condition involving a new goal position with a learned key-mapping, especially with a prestart delay.
  • This indicates that prior knowledge influences learning when adapting to new task elements.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide evidence for the implementation of a model-based strategy in human motor sequence learning.
  • Humans leverage previously acquired internal models of state transitions to guide action selection and learning.