Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program
Grant D Huang1, Ryan E Ferguson, Peter N Peduzzi
1Cooperative Studies Program Central Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia 20420, USA. grant.huang@va.gov
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) can improve healthcare but faces challenges. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) offers a model for conducting large-scale CER studies, providing valuable lessons and addressing barriers.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is crucial for improving patient outcomes and informing healthcare decisions.
- Conducting CER faces significant methodological, resource, and translational challenges.
- The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) has a long history of generating clinical evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the VA CSP as a model for addressing challenges in comparative effectiveness research.
- To identify strategies and lessons learned from conducting large-scale CER studies within the CSP.
- To discuss future directions for CER within the VA and nationally.
Main Methods:
- The article reviews the structure and operational factors of the VA CSP.
- It examines how CSP strategies support the planning and execution of comparative studies.
- Lessons from CSP's experience with CER are discussed.
Main Results:
- The CSP infrastructure and experience provide a viable model for large, national, and multinational CER.
- Exploration of CSP's challenges offers insights into broader barriers facing CER.
- The CSP's approach addresses scientific, structural, and operational factors critical for CER.
Conclusions:
- The VA CSP serves as a valuable model for conducting definitive comparative effectiveness studies.
- Understanding CSP's experiences can help overcome barriers to CER implementation.
- Future directions emphasize the importance of collaborative approaches for impactful CER.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence: Overview
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
