Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ARKG: Adversarially Residual Knowledge Generalization to Open-Set Domain Adaptation.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same author

Reconfiguring brain networks via lightweight dynamic connectivity framework: An EEG-based stress validation.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

Efficacy of a Ceftazidime-loaded Nanofiber Insert in Treating <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-induced Corneal Ulcers: An Animal Model.

Journal of ophthalmic & vision research·2025
Same author

Advancing Cognitive Load Detection in Simulated Driving Scenarios Through Deep Learning and fNIRS Data.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Autophagy and Reactive Oxygen Species in Megakaryopoiesis and Platelet Production.

DNA and cell biology·2025
Same author

Fatigue monitoring using wearables and AI: Trends, challenges, and future opportunities.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

Lower upper bound estimation method for construction of neural network-based prediction intervals.

Abbas Khosravi1, Saeid Nahavandi, Doug Creighton

  • 1Center for Intelligent Systems Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3117, Australia. abbas.khosravi@deakin.edu.au

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
|December 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a fast and reliable method for creating prediction intervals (PIs) using neural networks (NNs). The Lower Upper Bound Estimation (LUBE) method efficiently quantifies forecast uncertainty without needing prior bound information.

More Related Videos

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistics
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Traditional neural network (NN) prediction intervals (PIs) often rely on strict data assumptions and are computationally intensive.
  • Quantifying uncertainty in point forecasts is crucial for reliable predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel, efficient, and dependable method for constructing PIs for NN predictions.
  • To address the limitations of existing PI construction techniques in terms of computational cost and distributional assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed the Lower Upper Bound Estimation (LUBE) method, utilizing a two-output NN to estimate PI bounds.
  • Developed a PI-based objective function to optimize both interval width and coverage probability during NN training.
  • Employed simulated annealing for cost function minimization and NN parameter tuning.

Main Results:

  • The LUBE method demonstrated the ability to generate high-quality PIs rapidly across 10 benchmark regression problems.
  • Quantitative comparisons showed LUBE to be simpler, faster, and more reliable than three traditional PI construction techniques.
  • The method effectively quantifies forecast uncertainty without requiring pre-defined PI bounds for training.

Conclusions:

  • The LUBE method offers a significant advancement in constructing accurate and efficient prediction intervals for neural network models.
  • This approach provides a more accessible and computationally feasible alternative for uncertainty quantification in forecasting.
  • LUBE enhances the reliability and practical applicability of neural network predictions in various regression tasks.