Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Comparative Effectiveness and Toxicity of Statins Among HIV-Infected Patients
Sudershan Singh1, James H Willig, Michael J Mugavero
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Insights
Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are more effective than pravastatin for lowering cholesterol in HIV patients. These statins achieved greater lipid reductions with similar toxicity rates, making them preferable choices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Dyslipidemia is prevalent in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients.
- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are common treatments for dyslipidemia.
- Comparative effectiveness of statins in HIV patients is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and toxicity of different statins in HIV-infected patients.
- To evaluate lipid level changes and achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals.
- To assess statin-associated toxicity rates in this population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 700 HIV-infected patients initiating statin therapy.
- Primary outcome: change in lipid levels (total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-HDL-C).
- Secondary outcomes: NCEP goal attainment and toxicity rates; linear regression and propensity score analyses were used.
Main Results:
- Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C compared to pravastatin.
- Higher likelihood of reaching LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin versus pravastatin.
- Similar toxicity rates observed across atorvastatin (7.3%), pravastatin (6.1%), and rosuvastatin (5.3%).
Conclusions:
- Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are recommended over pravastatin for managing dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients.
- These statins offer superior lipid-lowering effects with comparable safety profiles.
- Findings support informed statin selection for improved cardiovascular risk management in HIV care.
Background:
dyslipidemia is common and is often treated with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins). Little is known about the comparative effectiveness of statins among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. This study compared the effectiveness and toxicity of statins among HIV-infected patients in clinical care.
Methods:
we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients starting their initial statin medications at 2 large HIV clinics (N = 700). The primary observation was change in lipid levels during statin therapy. Secondary observations included whether individualized National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels were reached, and toxicity rates. We used linear regression to examine change in lipid levels, controlling for baseline lipid values and demographic and clinical characteristics. We conducted secondary analyses using propensity scores to address confounding by indication.
Results:
the most commonly prescribed statins were atorvastatin (N = 303), pravastatin (N = 280), and rosuvastatin (N = 95). One year after starting a statin therapy, patients who received atorvastatin or rosuvastatin had significantly greater decreases in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C than patients on pravastatin. The likelihood of reaching NCEP goals for LDL-C levels was higher with the use of rosuvastatin (OR 2.1; P = .03) and atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; P = .001) compared with that of pravastatin. The likelihood of reaching NCEP goals for non-HDL-C levels was higher for rosuvastatin (OR 2.3; P = .045) but not atorvastatin (OR, 1.5; P = .1) compared with pravastatin. Toxicity rates were similar for all 3 statins: 7.3% for atorvastatin, 6.1% for pravastatin, and 5.3% for rosuvastatin.
Conclusions:
our findings suggest that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are preferable to pravastatin for treatment of HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia, due to greater declines in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C, with similar lower toxicity rates.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
