Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

12:01
The Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Fascia Flap for Nerve Reconstruction in Rabbits
Published on: June 13, 2025
Peroneal perforator flap for intraoral reconstruction
Klaus D Wolff1, Florian Bauer, Jennifer Wylie
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany.
The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
|December 31, 2010
Summary
The peroneal perforator flap offers a safe and effective alternative for intraoral reconstruction, particularly for small to medium defects. This method minimizes donor site complications, making it a valuable option for patients requiring oral tissue repair.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Thin, pliable flaps with long pedicles are ideal for intraoral lining.
- The radial forearm free flap, previously preferred, has donor site complications.
- Peroneal perforator flaps are explored as an alternative reconstructive option.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroneal perforator flaps for intraoral reconstruction.
- To assess donor site morbidity associated with the peroneal perforator flap.
- To compare peroneal perforator flaps with existing methods for oral defects.
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients underwent intraoral reconstruction using peroneal perforator flaps.
- Preoperative Magnetic Resonance (MR) angiography identified major perforating vessels.
- Flaps were raised via a lateral approach, with direct wound closure at the donor site.
Main Results:
- All identified perforators were accessible, with most having a septocutaneous course.
- Flap survival rate was high (all but one flap survived).
- Reconstructions included floor of mouth, tongue, and buccal mucosa with satisfactory functional outcomes and low donor site morbidity.
Conclusions:
- The peroneal perforator flap, guided by MR angiography, is a safe and effective option for intraoral reconstruction.
- It is a suitable alternative for small to medium oral defects, offering the advantage of inconspicuous donor site closure.
- This technique presents a valuable option to reduce donor site complications compared to traditional methods.
