Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
The correlation between annular treatment margins and biochemical failure in prostate brachytherapy patients with
Nathan Bittner1, Gregory S Merrick, Wayne M Butler
1Tacoma/Valley Radiation Oncology Centers, Tacoma, WA.
Purpose:
To determine whether periprostatic treatment margins correlate with biochemical control in prostate brachytherapy patients with optimized intraprostatic dosimetry.
Methods And Materials:
Nineteen biochemically failed brachytherapy patients were matched to 74 dosimetric and clinically equivalent nonfailures. The median followup time for the entire study population was 9.4 years. Eligibility requirements included a Day 0 intraprostatic D(90) of 100% or greater and V(100) of 90% or greater, absence of androgen deprivation therapy, and no evidence of distant metastasis in biochemically failed patients. A 5-mm annulus was constructed around the perimeter of each prostate. D(90) and V(100) at the anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right lateral, and left lateral aspects of the annulus were evaluated for patients with biochemically controlled and failed disease. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was defined as a prostate-specific antigen level of 0.40ng/mL or less after nadir. D(90) and V(100) parameters were compared between the controlled and failed groups using logistic regression. Predictors of biochemical failure were identified using Cox regression.
Results:
No statistically significant differences in prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, percent positive biopsies, or intraprostatic dosimetry were observed between the controlled and failed patients. The D(90) and V(100) at the anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right lateral, and left lateral aspects of the annulus were not statistically different between biochemically controlled and failed groups.
Conclusion:
In this study, there was no relationship observed between annular dosimetry and biochemical control. It is unlikely that further radial dose intensification would have altered treatment outcome in this population of patients with optimized intraprostatic dosimetry.
