Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation

Sample Size Calculation

Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

Bootstrapping

Bootstrapping

The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is small or...

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

RaVÆn: unsupervised change detection of extreme events using ML on-board satellites.

Scientific reports·2022

Same author

Self-supervised learning for using overhead imagery as maps in outdoor range sensor localization.

The International journal of robotics research·2022

Same author

kRadar++: Coarse-to-Fine FMCW Scanning Radar Localisation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Same author

Empowering phase II clinical trials to reduce phase III failures.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2019

Same author

Profit Evaluations When Adaptation by Design Is Applied.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2018

Same author

Computing individual and collective ethical utility for optimally planning phase III trials.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2018

Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Conservative sample size estimation in nonparametrics.

Daniele De Martini¹

¹Dipartimento DIMEQUANT, Universita degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy. daniele.demartini@unimib.it

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

|December 31, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new bootstrap method offers conservative sample size estimation for phase III clinical trials using phase II data. This approach improves power estimation, especially when phase II sample sizes are near optimal for phase III, ensuring more reliable trial planning.

More Related Videos

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Statistical Methods

Background:

Phase III clinical trials are often underpowered due to uncertainties from phase II results.
Conservative approaches for sample size estimation are increasingly important in trial planning.
Existing parametric methods use effect size lower bounds for conservative power estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a general bootstrap method for conservative sample size estimation for phase III trials.
To utilize phase II data for more accurate sample size determination.
To provide a nonparametric approach for estimating the true power of a test.

Main Methods:

A general bootstrap method is proposed for sample size estimation.
The method employs nonparametric lower bounds for estimating true power.
Performance is compared against standard techniques using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Main Results:

The bootstrap method demonstrates superior performance in power estimation compared to standard techniques.
This improvement is particularly notable when phase II sample sizes approximate the ideal phase III sample size.
The proposed method offers better results than asymptotic normality-based techniques.

Conclusions:

The developed bootstrap method provides a robust and general approach for conservative sample size estimation in phase III trials.
This method can enhance the reliability of clinical trial planning, especially in scenarios with limited phase II data.
The generalizability allows application to various trial designs, including superiority, noninferiority, and multiple endpoint trials.