Executive function deficit in preschool children born very low birth weight with normal early development
Tzu-Lo Ni1, Chao-Ching Huang, Nai-Wen Guo
1Institute of Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.
Insights
Children born very low birth weight (VLBW) with normal early development still face executive function deficits. These deficits in planning, cognitive flexibility, and working memory persist, influenced by factors like gestation age and birth weight.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Children born very low birth weight (VLBW) are at increased risk for executive function (EF) deficits.
- Previous studies did not fully isolate the impact of early developmental abnormalities on EF deficits in VLBW children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if six-year-old VLBW children with normal early development exhibit executive function deficits.
- To investigate the specific EF domains affected in this population.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 37 six-year-old VLBW children (with normal early development) and 22 typically developing children.
- Assessment of executive functions including impulse control, planning, cognitive flexibility, and working memory using standardized tests (e.g., ToL, WCST, Knox's Cube, WISC-IV Digit Span).
Main Results:
- VLBW children showed significantly lower scores in planning, cognitive flexibility, and nonverbal working memory compared to controls.
- The significance of these EF deficits was reduced after adjusting for gestation age and birth weight.
Conclusions:
- Six-year-old VLBW children, even with normal early development, remain at risk for deficits in planning, cognitive flexibility, and nonverbal working memory.
- Gestation age and birth weight are significant covariant factors influencing these executive function outcomes.
Background:
many studies showed that children born very low birth weight (VLBW) are at high risk of executive function (EF) deficit, including impulse control, working memory and cognitive flexibility. However, they did not exclude the influence of abnormal early development on EF deficit.
Aims:
The aim was to investigate if six-year-old VLBW children with normal early development still have EF deficit.
Methods:
the research was conducted in two groups. The VLBW group included 37 children at aged 6, with more than 70 of Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSIDII) before aged 2. The normal group included 22 term children aged 6 who were born healthy and developed normally, with comparable IQ and social economic status. Five instruments, including Comprehensive Nonverbal Attention Test Battery (CNAT), Tower of London (ToL), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Knox's Cube Test and Digit Span Subtest of WISC-IV, were analyzed to evaluate four kinds of EF, including impulse control, planning, cognitive flexibility and working memory.
Results:
the EF of VLBW group was significantly lower in independent t-test on the scores of planning in ToL, cognitive flexibility in WCST and nonverbal working memory in Knox's Cube Test. Yet, the inferiority in EF of VLBW group became less significant when ANCOVA analysis was used to adjust gestation age and birth weight.
Conclusions:
six-year-old VLBW children even with normal early development are still at risk of deficits in "planning", "cognitive flexibility" and "nonverbal working memory" while the preterm factors, both gestation age and birth weight, were important covariant factors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.
Intellectual Disability
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...


