Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Bone cement penetration pattern and primary stability testing in keeled and pegged glenoid components
Patric Raiss1, Guido Pape, Kerstin Kleinschmidt
1Orthopaedic Department, University of Heidelberg, Germany. Patric.Raiss@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|January 4, 2011
Summary
Lower bone mineral density (BMD) correlates with increased cement penetration in cemented glenoid components, regardless of implant design. Modern cementing techniques are vital for component stability, especially in patients with poor bone quality.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Radiology
Background:
- Bone mineral density (BMD) is hypothesized to influence cement penetration in arthroplasty.
- This study investigated the correlation between BMD and cement penetration in cemented glenoid components.
- The influence of implant design on cement penetration was also examined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the correlation between bone mineral density and cement penetration in cemented glenoid components.
- To assess the impact of implant design (keeled vs. pegged) on cement penetration.
- To evaluate the pull-out strength and primary stability of different glenoid component designs.
Main Methods:
- BMD was measured in 10 pairs of scapulas.
- Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was used to analyze cement penetration after implantation of keeled and pegged glenoid components.
- A third-generation cementing technique with a vacuum mixing system was employed.
- Pull-out strength testing was conducted to assess primary stability.
Main Results:
- A strong negative correlation was found between BMD and mean cement penetration for both pegged (R² = -0.83) and keeled (R² = -0.81) glenoid components.
- Mean cement penetration was significantly greater in the pegged group (113.9 mm²) compared to the keeled group (78.4 mm²).
- While components detached from the cement mantle, bone-cement interfaces remained intact, with higher pull-out strength observed for keeled components (1093N) versus pegged components (884N).
Conclusions:
- Modern cementing techniques are crucial for achieving deep bone-cement bonding and preventing glenoid component loosening.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering BMD and implant design in cemented glenoid arthroplasty.
- These results are particularly relevant for patient selection in cases of poor bone quality, such as osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis.
