Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Financing Care for CYSHCN in the Next Decade: Reducing Burden, Advancing Equity, and Transforming Systems.

Pediatrics·2022

Same author

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation is Associated with Lower Health Care Spending among Working Age Adults without Dependents.

Journal of health care for the poor and underserved·2022

Same author

The effects of financial incentives on diabetes prevention program attendance and weight loss among low-income patients: the We Can Prevent Diabetes cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BMC public health·2020

Same author

Comment on "Wide Variation and Overprescription of Opioids After Elective Surgery".

Annals of surgery·2018

Same author

Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.

Contemporary clinical trials·2016

Same author

Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2014

Same journal

Parent's hesitance about HPV Vaccine: Using the CASE approach to address their concerns.

Minnesota medicine·2021

Same journal

Vaping, lung injury, and mental health Minnesota 2018-2019.

Minnesota medicine·2021

Same journal

Characteristics of clinical extrapulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria isolates in Minnesota, 2013-2017.

Minnesota medicine·2020

Same journal

Challenges for younger adults with diabetes.

Minnesota medicine·2020

Same journal

Telemedicine in Minnesota: A look at how four specialties are using it.

Minnesota medicine·2019

Same journal

The Doctor Will See You On Screen: Telemedicine offers convenient access to care, cost savings and the same quality as in-person visits-sometimes.

Minnesota medicine·2019

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

Preventing elective induction before 39 weeks.

Trudy Ohnsorg¹, Jeff Schiff

¹Minnesota Health Services Advisory Council, USA.

Minnesota Medicine

|January 5, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Elective labor induction offers no medical benefits and carries risks for mothers and infants, especially before 39 weeks gestation. New policies and patient education on induction risks are recommended.

More Related Videos

Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs

Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs

Published on: December 22, 2023

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Published on: October 25, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs

Continuous Telemetric In Utero Tracheal Pressure Measurements in Fetal Lambs

Published on: December 22, 2023

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Published on: October 25, 2015

Area of Science:

Perinatal Medicine
Obstetrics
Public Health Policy

Background:

Induction of labor has increased significantly in the US over the past 30 years.
Elective induction, particularly before 39 weeks gestation, lacks proven medical benefits.
Existing research indicates potential risks associated with elective labor induction for both mother and infant.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the current research on the benefits and risks of elective labor induction.
To report recommendations from a Minnesota Department of Human Services advisory group on perinatal practices.
To advocate for updated hospital policies and improved patient education regarding labor induction.

Main Methods:

Review of existing scientific literature on labor induction.
Analysis of recommendations from a state-level advisory group.
Synthesis of findings to inform policy and clinical practice.

Main Results:

Elective induction of labor is not associated with medical benefits.
Induction before 39 weeks gestation poses risks to maternal and infant health.
The advisory group recommends policy changes and enhanced patient counseling.

Conclusions:

Elective labor induction should be approached with caution due to associated risks.
Healthcare providers should educate patients thoroughly on the risks of early-term induction.
Hospitals should review and update policies concerning elective labor induction practices.