Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Hubris: a primal danger
1Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry at West Virginia University in Morgantown, USA. dtrumbull@hsc.wvu.edu
Psychiatry
|January 5, 2011
Summary
Sophocles
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Ancient Greek Tragedy
- Clinical Psychiatry
Background:
- The Oedipus myth, often linked to Freudian psychoanalysis, was originally intended by Sophocles as a cautionary tale.
- Hubris, or excessive pride, was a central theme in ancient Greek warnings against overreaching ambition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-examine the Oedipus myth through the lens of its original intent, focusing on warnings against hubris.
- To propose that ancient warnings about hubris are embedded in human evolutionary psychology.
- To encourage clinicians to distinguish between pride and hubris in moral decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of Sophocles' Oedipus Rex and its historical context.
- Review of evolutionary psychology research on cooperation, fairness, and reciprocity.
- Theoretical integration of ancient warnings with modern behavioral science.
Main Results:
- Hubris poses a threat to prosocial behaviors essential for species survival.
- Humans exhibit innate predispositions to protect cooperative behaviors and punish threats.
- Pride and hubris elicit distinct motivational and goal-directed responses in moral contexts.
Conclusions:
- Archetypal warnings against hubris have played a crucial role in human evolution.
- Understanding the distinction between pride and hubris is vital for clinical practice and moral psychology.
- The study highlights the enduring relevance of ancient wisdom for contemporary behavioral science.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
01:29Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
01:41Social Traps
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
01:34Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...