Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identifying injuries and trauma severity in large databases.

J C Young1, D P Macioce, W W Young

  • 1Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The Journal of Trauma
|October 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Accurately identifying trauma patients is crucial for effective care assessment. Patient Management Categories (PMCs) offer superior accuracy in identifying trauma patients from hospital discharge data compared to Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Care of the Sick and Injured.

Buffalo medical journal·2023
Same author

The Management of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Buffalo medical journal·2023
Same author

Medico-Legal Facts and Testimony in the Trial of Henry C. Hendryx, for the Murder of His Wife.

Buffalo medical and surgical journal·2023
Same author

Present Status of Pneumococcus Infections.

Atlanta journal-record of medicine·2022
Same author

Operationalising the "One Health" approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control.

BMC public health·2021
Same author

Possible Role of Trichothecene Mycotoxins in Virulence of Fusarium graminearum on Maize.

Plant disease·2019

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Trauma Care
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Accurate identification of trauma patients and their severity is essential for evaluating inpatient trauma care costs and effectiveness.
  • Routinely collected hospital discharge abstract data offers a potential source for identifying trauma patients across all healthcare facilities, not solely specialized trauma centers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a methodology for identifying trauma patients and their injury severity using routinely collected hospital discharge abstract data.
  • To compare the accuracy of two computerized patient classification systems, Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and Patient Management Categories (PMCs), against a trauma registry gold standard.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized discharge abstract data from all hospitals and compared it with trauma registry data from a major trauma center.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the validity of DRGs and PMCs in classifying trauma patients and identifying those incorrectly omitted from the registry.
  • Reviewed medical records to verify injury classification accuracy and omissions by each system.
  • Main Results:

    • Patient Management Categories (PMCs) demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (95.1%) in identifying trauma patients compared to Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) (44.4%) and the registry standard (91.8%).
    • DRGs exhibited low specificity (21.2%) and sensitivity (47.9%) for identifying injured trauma patients, leading to unpredictable hospital payments and misleading management decisions.
    • PMCs showed high sensitivity (97.8%) and acceptable specificity (77.7%) for trauma patient identification.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient Management Categories (PMCs) provide a more accurate and reliable method for identifying trauma patients using routinely collected discharge data.
    • The findings suggest PMCs can enhance injury surveillance, improve outcome monitoring (morbidity and mortality), and support more equitable hospital payment systems.
    • Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) are not suitable for accurate trauma patient identification, impacting cost assessment and clinical management.