Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Think positive, perform better: The detrimental effect of technical motor imagery before action.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

The mind's clock: Investigating the link between motor imagery timing and personality traits.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Effect of motor imagery training of dorsiflexor muscles on motor unit behavior.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

Tropical climate and time of day: A dual influence on implicit motor imagery ability.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

EEG-Metabolic Coupling and Time Limit at V˙O<sub>2</sub>max During Constant-Load Exercise.

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology·2025
Same author

Revisiting the mental imagery debate: New evidence from aphantasia and neuroimaging.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Motor Imagery Performance Through Embodied Digital Twins in a Virtual Reality-Enabled Brain-Computer Interface Environment
10:14

Motor Imagery Performance Through Embodied Digital Twins in a Virtual Reality-Enabled Brain-Computer Interface Environment

Published on: May 10, 2024

Measuring motor imagery using psychometric, behavioral, and psychophysiological tools.

Christian Collet1, Aymeric Guillot, Florent Lebon

  • 1Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.

Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
|January 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This review explores methods for measuring motor imagery (MI). It evaluates self-report, mental chronometry, and physiological indices, proposing the Motor Imagery Index for assessing MI quality.

More Related Videos

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
09:42

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke

Published on: September 1, 2023

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces
05:36

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Motor Imagery Performance Through Embodied Digital Twins in a Virtual Reality-Enabled Brain-Computer Interface Environment
10:14

Motor Imagery Performance Through Embodied Digital Twins in a Virtual Reality-Enabled Brain-Computer Interface Environment

Published on: May 10, 2024

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
09:42

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke

Published on: September 1, 2023

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces
05:36

STFEEG-Tool: A Spatial-Temporal-Frequency EEG Analysis Tool for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Motor imagery (MI) is a cognitive process involving the mental simulation of movement.
  • Accurate measurement of MI is crucial for understanding its neural underpinnings and applications.
  • Existing measurement techniques have limitations in objectivity and comprehensiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate current methods for measuring motor imagery.
  • To explore the utility of physiological indices in quantifying MI.
  • To introduce a novel composite measure, the Motor Imagery Index, for assessing MI quality.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of literature on MI measurement techniques.
  • Analysis of self-report questionnaires assessing MI vividness and control.
  • Evaluation of mental chronometry paradigms measuring reaction times during imagined movements.
  • Examination of physiological markers from the autonomic nervous system (ANS) during MI.
  • Development of the Motor Imagery Index by integrating physiological data.

Main Results:

  • Self-report measures offer subjective insights but lack objectivity.
  • Mental chronometry provides performance-based but indirect MI assessment.
  • Autonomic nervous system indices (e.g., heart rate, skin conductance) reflect arousal during MI.
  • The proposed Motor Imagery Index integrates multiple physiological signals for a more robust MI assessment.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-modal approach combining subjective, performance, and physiological measures is optimal for MI assessment.
  • The Motor Imagery Index offers a promising, objective method for quantifying MI quality.
  • Further validation of the Motor Imagery Index in diverse populations and tasks is warranted.